From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F053E138247 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AFE4E0B1F; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be (andre.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D070E09F6 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id HBhB1n00G2khLEN01BhBB1; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:41:11 +0100 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:40:04 +0100 From: Tom Wijsman To: rich0@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights Message-ID: <20140123004004.5c0fc7df@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: References: <20140119050224.GA7898@laptop.home> <20140120035446.063a31be@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <52DD2E2A.2020303@gmail.com> <20140121155616.6a8cdf9b@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <52DF6C7E.8020908@gmail.com> <52DFBABD.8090102@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/pmTsxtgp1p.V+u7OmdrHg3/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: bf566f7f-72d7-477a-87b4-56870af56691 X-Archives-Hash: b8d5fc4d3c40869fe26fce4adf32b1f8 --Sig_/pmTsxtgp1p.V+u7OmdrHg3/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:42:14 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > So, this was what I was trying to get at in my email. I see a couple > of different models being thrown around and they really differ on the > guidelines as to how QA would apply the power to suspend devs. Looking at the rest of your mail besides this; I think that what needs to be discussed further is which cases would be a ComRel matter and which cases would not be. There are some loosely defined borders we know of ("technical", "personal", "CoC violation", "breakage", ...) but when it comes to matters that lie on the borders of the above or there are combinations possible, I think we have some situations where both solutions may be possible, maybe we should try to work these out a bit further.=20 As when we would wait till it happens and then start to discuss whose matter this is, it would form a problem as well as a delay. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/pmTsxtgp1p.V+u7OmdrHg3/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS4FbUAAoJEJWyH81tNOV94QIH/3ay6U0xC+VNa7ls/lFbwy/r DU0VE9a9Pj8H5CwPWFnkm2JX8aRw5b0Z0IUPozty3ppCes0zSqoRHaytXPc6lnsC CufzuttS/dHTA18B7wF6Mm9dM1nNbhK50jKebA6FIOnWaz0bXPud5HICjhWomcMa 7BxpAOMXhDvAfiDAyQzNCern0FFidztxKARx2Um5YyoqoQZhRFzkIfQPkaZV4Ehm dhQYZCege55p0yYIGe/JxgJWomXer1B0un1coisuu6p9F2tcgp1hNHPH7QnT6fdH 5FJkpM3MJs8hOJh1+4rGCwdBgsGnn5HGtIFWYUClYSPamDXsmS57mQAysdhTFu8= =zVf8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/pmTsxtgp1p.V+u7OmdrHg3/--