From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9DB138247 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D53BE0BC7; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be (baptiste.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.51]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361BDE0BC0 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id HB151n00X2khLEN01B15rh; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:01:06 +0100 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:59:53 +0100 From: Tom Wijsman To: ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights Message-ID: <20140122235953.2f24792a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <20140122175400.4835d32b@googlemail.com> References: <20140119050224.GA7898@laptop.home> <20140120035446.063a31be@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <52DD2E2A.2020303@gmail.com> <52DDBDBF.1020206@gentoo.org> <20140122175400.4835d32b@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/+GXvTDBGP3LzJQXmObXR3yo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 41030c09-9f5c-4d7f-97a3-9c82371da799 X-Archives-Hash: daf7d4da31bfa4f98222e1820e845c3a --Sig_/+GXvTDBGP3LzJQXmObXR3yo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:54:00 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:22:23 +0800 > Patrick Lauer wrote: > > And the biggest "flamewar" so far was about cosmetic issues. > > Y'know, if I get around to it I'll try to work towards making most > > of these warnings fatal, then you can't accidentally add such > > things. (And people not using repoman will have some extra fun!) >=20 > Well couldn't QA start focusing on non-cosmetic issues? I can provide > a list if you need it. >=20 Yes, we already do; fixing reverse dependencies that break on a bump, migrating ebuilds away from deprecated EAPIs, working on QA bugs, ... ... but a list with more ideas is very welcome. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/+GXvTDBGP3LzJQXmObXR3yo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS4E1uAAoJEJWyH81tNOV9JnwH/1+HuwBG0oeLKNcVORu+68CV 7+174/vQe/O2WxTajXROF76Ms4b/M5CwhqeEZ46L9tcre8Q3vLrXm7k0vLEvO6yW bEWS9VW9R3DoZ+oFfQUQTbNU0IQedvShfRVk4GOFWMD0fuXaqzPucwDgLX4workN TFYya2RM+JD7aw2IF+eZJELflGQpM1GcHFPkX3mhQZfjCnLQPt02IKaI+NYamdZt tqh8jYFkT3A/kgvv2xYEGEEwyqASkjr9A266O3YrLfv9RJD+cEIPGZuve0vqS2/n /3J243yP0ddZzAx9yPsJq298r9tPqESeVGUFJixpVdl2xq8EOrqcJFQQg+12ozc= =zFII -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/+GXvTDBGP3LzJQXmObXR3yo--