From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0F4138247 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 748FDE0A82; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71B6BE0908 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB14A33FAF8 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:58:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:58:08 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.13.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201401200223.24912.vapier@gentoo.org> <20140120172613.GA6121@laptop.home> <52DD6886.6000507@plaimi.net> In-Reply-To: <52DD6886.6000507@plaimi.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1693016.NkQRQsUaJT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201401220158.08886.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: afd27a58-853e-4c77-bff5-6ca839267f12 X-Archives-Hash: 60e11b968b47fba5ca00b82ca7dca90a --nextPart1693016.NkQRQsUaJT Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 20 January 2014 13:18:46 Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 20/01/14 18:26, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:23:24AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> this has all been fairly ad-hoc in the past, so formalize it in > >> the one place that impacts everyone -- profiles.desc. > >=20 > > If it is policy, shouldn't it go in the dev manual rather than in > > this file? >=20 > profiles.desc is installed on a user's system. Users don't read the > dev manual. users don't care. this file concerns developers only. =2Dmike --nextPart1693016.NkQRQsUaJT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJS32wAAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBWpEQAIZ/YrsMj2rloy3/vcicCBBE FBDWU0pZx5zZWLQ4fZzOyebyQv3k7FkWqs8HC4LQxYKZh/h5zdTB+o0hmHDxs7O9 vyK7px8vjelccZPWsY8tajj2NsuOLPeqJXdzVCOuAyhfmBoKkVuFn1/aF7D9Da0P ydGsSnsBDfoWO29XULifSI5hKUOWoWelZyKsHzRzYVHh10yP350khBD2ef5RNj+b QNXeQuSqnNYf55WPByb/cBl/FGhXnte6WyGY+GplbOyef+GQ7yIpx7ui4dpCEvXy 5PBHwSFtRLz3YkCmVUKUecIUEYbjBgOMtOj/T0QQswu4dBoFgIewkGnX/wZqX1Ma Azn39zGeF0WQBHgDl7e87VXL+4c9dEgpJ/6A3YWiKkjnsr4cNJbwht/b6hE1753S FsFT42DLnRLyFx1EfKQvgL1QQ0UXBOSCZtCPxphg74+jnjrUQ9Oey0dKRgQUTDsS 6NgTf1YhXWJ/nGK5d5+ISMMbuDF6EqK7fvYdwqKpeRHvrJiAfuvmZrhHjCLGaGvI FgMLelyA/AJTNHuBwGbZ5QJswCiqSMXkHUk4LdeVoenp5uJ2S6W03J6bZ4lwStgA nZ0SplhVceSFaxi265Rh1n8BSP4plMALgFTeRnJVoxXp16har0Zxq3UDVzI3Rb3k f5wkGmD4Ifqs851ileAZ =wwgH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1693016.NkQRQsUaJT--