public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@gentoo.org>
To: peter@stuge.se
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:18:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140121201855.4c81826c@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140121181654.11052.qmail@stuge.se>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1929 bytes --]

On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:16:54 +0100
Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se> wrote:

> Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > > Anyone who cares about quality will be frustrated by others who
> > > do not.
> > 
> > We have policies to enforce quality, thus frustration is
> > optional. :)
> 
> Policies don't enforce quality, people enforce quality.

Well, we have policy [1] stating that QA can enforce quality until
overridden by a decision by the Council; so, to be fair, there are
even more parties involved than just the policy. Which doesn't change
the point; we can enforce quality, thus frustration is optional. :)

> And doing that is quickly frustrating.

There seems to be a lack of frustration in my experience as a QA
member; I care about quality by helping people fix breakage, this gives
me a feeling of accomplishment instead of a feeling of frustration.

> If enforcing quality would be a purely mechanical task there wouldn't
> be the same need for people, which would be ideal. But I think we're
> some ways away from that still.

We have (Auto)RepoMan and it improves as we speak; we are rather quite
close to it, making RepoMan warnings fatal is just a step away. Given
there is a lack of frustration, why should we do that? It could cause
more frustration than what it is trying to fix. Interesting thought...

Could we return back to the original subject of this thread?

 [1]: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:48

      "In the event that a developer still insists that a package does
      not break QA standards, an appeal can be made at the next council
      meeting. The package should be dealt with per QA's request until
      such a time that a decision is made by the council."

-- 
With kind regards,

Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer

E-mail address  : TomWij@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key  : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2  ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-21 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-19  5:02 [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights William Hubbs
2014-01-19  5:07 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-19  5:17 ` [gentoo-dev] " W. Trevor King
2014-01-19 12:46 ` [gentoo-dev] " hasufell
2014-01-20  1:05   ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-19 20:22 ` Denis Dupeyron
2014-01-20  1:01   ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-20  1:22     ` Denis Dupeyron
2014-01-20  2:47       ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-22 16:30   ` Jeroen Roovers
2014-01-20  1:24 ` Alec Warner
2014-01-20  2:54   ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-20 13:59     ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-20 14:09       ` Alan McKinnon
2014-01-21  0:22         ` Patrick Lauer
2014-01-21  0:46           ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-21  5:29             ` Alec Warner
2014-01-21  5:27           ` Alec Warner
2014-01-22 17:54           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2014-01-22 22:37             ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-01-22 22:59             ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 14:56         ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 15:47           ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-21 17:26             ` William Hubbs
2014-01-21 17:50               ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-21 17:56           ` Peter Stuge
2014-01-21 18:11             ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 18:16               ` Peter Stuge
2014-01-21 19:18                 ` Tom Wijsman [this message]
2014-01-21 21:03                   ` Thomas Sachau
2014-01-21 22:56                     ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 23:14                       ` William Hubbs
2014-01-22  7:00           ` Alan McKinnon
2014-01-22 10:36             ` hasufell
2014-01-22 10:39               ` hasufell
2014-01-22 10:58             ` Alec Warner
2014-01-22 23:29               ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-22 12:34             ` Patrick Lauer
2014-01-22 19:42               ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-22 23:40                 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-22 22:06               ` Alan McKinnon
2014-01-22 23:15             ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 23:20         ` hasufell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140121201855.4c81826c@TOMWIJ-GENTOO \
    --to=tomwij@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=peter@stuge.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox