From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635E2138247 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 18:17:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9898E106A; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 18:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 709F8E105C for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 18:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11053 invoked by uid 501); 21 Jan 2014 18:16:54 -0000 Message-ID: <20140121181654.11052.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:16:54 +0100 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20140119050224.GA7898@laptop.home> <20140120035446.063a31be@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <52DD2E2A.2020303@gmail.com> <20140121155616.6a8cdf9b@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20140121175657.9455.qmail@stuge.se> <20140121191154.10d9bd28@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140121191154.10d9bd28@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> X-Archives-Salt: f6252cc2-a37a-4a67-8f28-f1b12a5a4ad4 X-Archives-Hash: 4d32b432af1133b34d517dfcccf08b35 --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom Wijsman wrote: > > Anyone who cares about quality will be frustrated by others who do not. >=20 > We have policies to enforce quality, thus frustration is optional. :) Policies don't enforce quality, people enforce quality. And doing that is quickly frustrating. If enforcing quality would be a purely mechanical task there wouldn't be the same need for people, which would be ideal. But I think we're some ways away from that still. //Peter --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFS3rmWhR3Q0dhIfEgRApavAJ9+c5RaNWmvRo9E99N0oJemO+WAjgCfcTwy Qmi37SmnNbYUOXor64s857I= =Cv3o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2--