From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F97F138247 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29FF5E0FE1; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38C10E0FBC for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id vb8so7756783obc.31 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:54:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=Hduwg0unQgvZ2aH3Y1Z3Fv3BpOloPysx0k7/eYS71FU=; b=zXSjiCu1By/Tf52hfqlPr9hnB2wGUx0FWoBdvfsKVX4YiTWJoZkygWeNmD88giSJKm SYHSUVDrQdXgJs2koz56mu3OfLaLHbJAiQu4oDOt5sFjO3U7yAPLKPdG93+zT1iPpnZO 3g8+dqRWo1El0PDAuZ3JQxqEnklJnrHBxYrtVzOx8hQ8SifCQH+YKBedhN6qYBtQa9ME lFk7L26VSKFmijEj6Lynf0FBEqRqiPdEC/2YSwE63m0yhQ2x+4OAQKTsbxFEig/hijQ9 74MIE6OXiDNnJeN4Fcx+MIWG9CNmlk6LS2GAFHaAiO4vTFWRYttvsFlF3O396wRUNQ9g 6VdA== X-Received: by 10.182.42.105 with SMTP id n9mr16955536obl.33.1390244072331; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:54:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m7sm2694208obo.7.2014.01.20.10.54.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:54:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by laptop (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:54:26 -0600 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:54:26 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy Message-ID: <20140120185426.GA6386@laptop.home> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <201401200223.24912.vapier@gentoo.org> <20140120172613.GA6121@laptop.home> <52DD6886.6000507@plaimi.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52DD6886.6000507@plaimi.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: e9ef0169-4455-4ec3-b5ff-0e4751247598 X-Archives-Hash: ddd7b7ffbdc7637a807f872a6616197f --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 07:18:46PM +0100, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 >=20 > On 20/01/14 18:26, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:23:24AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> this has all been fairly ad-hoc in the past, so formalize it in > >> the one place that impacts everyone -- profiles.desc. > > If it is policy, shouldn't it go in the dev manual rather than in=20 > > this file? > profiles.desc is installed on a user's system. Users don't read the > dev manual. All policies are being documented in the dev manual, so I was just saying that I think this should go there if it is going to be official. Whether or not it is in a local file (on the users' system) isn't relevant, developers should be familiar with the dev manual. William --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlLdcOIACgkQblQW9DDEZTjQpACgsebqmWWCk60tgV9H70WBbD/k 3IkAnjbim8BneFIzPvOGASJ6e2WOganP =83vE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--