From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2438C138247 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC299E0E00; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be (andre.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DA2E0C3B for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id G1631n00E2khLEN01163rd; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:06:03 +0100 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:05:01 +0100 From: Tom Wijsman To: hasufell@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights Message-ID: <20140120020501.21ac6947@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <52DBC909.2040407@gentoo.org> References: <20140119050224.GA7898@laptop.home> <52DBC909.2040407@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/gCs/I2k6GcRtpuJ5.iSxh2v"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: bd45b58a-c1ec-46e9-acdf-0cd4c495fdb8 X-Archives-Hash: c4f15e40a5ed892da6bd1c2c4a68edf9 --Sig_/gCs/I2k6GcRtpuJ5.iSxh2v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:46:01 +0100 hasufell wrote: > > either the QA lead or two members of the QA team can require the > > Infra team to temporarily suspend commit access for the developer >=20 > -1 to that part >=20 > That sounds like you are able to make non-trivial decisions without > the approval of the lead. For non-trivial decisions, two members is indeed a bit low; it is probably made in the time of a smaller team, as increasing the amount would beat its purpose (for in case lead is absent) it sounds like "or two members of the QA team" should just be removed. (For trivial decisions, this is in place to deal with extreme breakage.) --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/gCs/I2k6GcRtpuJ5.iSxh2v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS3HY9AAoJEJWyH81tNOV9iJwH+wVEbj8P77LTCBRxQ1OqJLmT VSXmy8tbMcYZhAyfh+MzmGjNo/nllVUWMCHg12dx6vv1gUsMbNsoGK0O/vCn6Yrh GrayXkZwKeJF13eAzBH77gZn5p3rDQBpluPmEQ46h64SzJegfi5Sw73jk0JaW8ti +5NoDraFs+4Ea5VXvOTyr64ctqpWLitrFeUWAYWzjbGKy4AiZtPwdnoROjD6Y++b OrPDYGIJyDnEeAArkgqFVV5mnEmvIDG7mFtuKyWgARTIrMNxkkdpzd8Xj8AxFgcO m5o6msGPwS08vxtdUJc2RcIGXeG0dz0HwsaV2/dSy2JRxwkHe9UZcHc0x4l4CWc= =Z9FS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/gCs/I2k6GcRtpuJ5.iSxh2v--