From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8209138247 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91D08E0AF6; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be (andre.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846D2E09AF for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id FTTU1n00f2khLEN01TTUA1; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:27:28 +0100 Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:26:27 +0100 From: Tom Wijsman To: robbat2@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] overlays.gentoo.org restoration & post-mortem Message-ID: <20140118162627.04a29e3a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <20140118050256.GF3378@orbis-terrarum.net> References: <20140118050256.GF3378@orbis-terrarum.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/queeZ6RiIarzXvJx2SIQvBy"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 851dfb33-dc94-4d60-9d54-f06ef96d04b5 X-Archives-Hash: abf90e0e4eb3c09c419b15a37c29a3bc --Sig_/queeZ6RiIarzXvJx2SIQvBy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 05:02:56 +0000 "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > FYI: The following repos appeared to be empty: > ... > dev/tomwij.git > ... Not empty, has app-office/taskjuggler and dev-java/jetty-*; did a check against my local clone, and `git ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD | sha1sum` reports the same, the same goes for `git log | sha1sum`. You can assume this repository to be in good enough state, perhaps it is because of the different case of the letters that this was a mismatch; anyhow, thank you for a detailed analysis and data recovery. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/queeZ6RiIarzXvJx2SIQvBy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS2p0jAAoJEJWyH81tNOV9qlYH+gNqdAwStB5lBZ/F3mxd4xUj ECQoXXNMxJ8tJq3rVYJMg1+3tLSuD1uQvJYg8OmbeSAIgX8XYDheD072eNjgzIlR igVWhjKOO1aYS4rtq1D94gVlRX3OE25Xqf3T3iR1wlseTnhJ8cGBDCLXlpLzLoOo YFaaXe53Zupv9Zh0WIqmiIswPIUjuPqsK3n3IE2CEEZQ7BGejtaYfXpotmXLuQ4d kIfSoM31/YeA6jCQ0ANmTolCkOLUuW33IuYecQZHuuO/qQNIDUwe3rs0BO/gNavR YXZUXxMyuQroB4PRFA9M88//z6RZZcrt+dI6PJQMbVtjcDGzi/C26wIzM/365/w= =lyZO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/queeZ6RiIarzXvJx2SIQvBy--