From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9ADE138247 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA06DE0B76; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.telenet-ops.be (albert.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.90]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C2AE0B2F for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by albert.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id EH511n00z2khLEN06H51C8; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:05:01 +0100 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:04:05 +0100 From: Tom Wijsman To: pinkbyte@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy Message-ID: <20140115180405.1cd06453@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <52D673A4.2080508@gentoo.org> References: <20140114213719.GA2684@laptop.home> <20140115004928.1fae6bf9@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <52D673A4.2080508@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/jcA0z5IjeLQlc72MGlJ1oBc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 99543a6b-8ca0-4f01-b955-b0503914aae2 X-Archives-Hash: b31a4c62342ef3eda47877b5e2920c1b --Sig_/jcA0z5IjeLQlc72MGlJ1oBc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:40:20 +0400 Sergey Popov wrote: > As i said earlier for similar proposals - the one option that i see > here to make all things going better - to recruit more people in arch > teams/arch testers. Other options lead us to nowhere, when stable > will be eliminated or transformed into fake. If eventually our existing approach yields no or worsening results, it would leads us nowhere as well; we can pick that option a few times, but if it doesn't improve anything we'll need to start reconsidering. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/jcA0z5IjeLQlc72MGlJ1oBc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS1r+FAAoJEJWyH81tNOV9xyYH/0D0gccPnvmlez6YPA12GMmC yyG8dEDinOz6EH57FjZ+pMDU4qwVPOcPfA4lOHEQLaNf5CrtklIjPy0+ISPvttj2 E+KjSP8gcVv+88bupbxM2481tprEzVQYv03PhSHGAr7+59qNgQtr1KFXwCuUlhlj 5KKD8ntbi5Kse7Z4P3fZBJ9mREDtLgkZR2X2Tk+i+YdbhbQclJoOudKliKGAU2Nm Ed/fAjJrFZKtDH3FSI704jh5XzhHaLvW+xg0sRMkjCqShBrLvC+Z5PcIYwNzQhau FRFOgC/Y2kSH1YEmolA8fzQ5u0TIP77bMSYJeDrB9qd2NQVzvkuxHIOf4b/lrjY= =Uh88 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/jcA0z5IjeLQlc72MGlJ1oBc--