From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727F4138247 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E371E09E5; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA264E08CA for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:05:15 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7771jWiJc= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-165-192.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.165.192]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 32.17 AUTH) with (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPSA id i024e2q0F052BCv for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 01:05:02 +0100 (CET) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 01:06:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.25-gentoo; KDE/4.12.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <20140114213719.GA2684@laptop.home> <20140115004928.1fae6bf9@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <20140115004928.1fae6bf9@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4730840.EyteNpZzHA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201401150106.20742.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 52f7df33-1c83-40b2-ac6b-5dd4bf7e191b X-Archives-Hash: 556ac82026fb1b9075e662d459e6783f --nextPart4730840.EyteNpZzHA Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2014, 00:49:28 schrieb Tom Wijsman: > On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:37:19 -0600 >=20 > William Hubbs wrote: > > Thoughts? >=20 > In this situation, I see three opposite ends of choices: >=20 Here's another idea:=20 4. Friendly ask the arch teams / make a policy that @system packages come=20 first.=20 (maybe these stable requests could be marked "major" in bugzilla then?) =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart4730840.EyteNpZzHA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJS1dD8XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwNzlCRDk4QzA4RENBRkYzQUEwRjQzMDlF QkU2QTMzNkJFMTkwMzlDAAoJEOvmoza+GQOcoIYP/ip/wlzXzL915AiCOrqDCOhF oq3cqjWIwoxI5Gc1wf2d44xB6MwlqOAWiuy1FBRzg+hmWb1PhnRyJPzoPQTo/ThW LtI6L4DbaeWNyP55paMTLgnGuEp/RBplxMPXo/7pWROQAwOeaoldaskj+3qHGS7K H/EnHvkfDJanDa24iNwE66cm007BUWV2LZxZM/Zja+DgIK2geXyaXvdGrjP8FRiy DNS8bFyQF6Jv3ZYewg3hJFbonbkdnD8Zceicy1xW45dvpeWURvFLqlpoW5XF33DI punfqXz/A/M+iz10AX89IRzSZu73KJEhaQpOZynpcr3tpZE7sP92zZLNeUDAzRqu VWCy0BOVIN6kOyUfeyzTGKnV8012wjHgHUHzI8Az3ITCysYkWzsOzmEeSO2NekFF 78VZhdZz+ek+h7Ava00Y8t/qWzPuGYlZJQ/4q5/ltZmhodSXTWueTXHz0EaEm4Xc Wp6LsaoE2+5x79D7lGa7RBUTrOYNhKqHCwd1nqLDa6yOIZnEi/xGusx2xCnTii2K CekwLsSRG3Cd5fktdP407UR6q4Hu/QFJ3XJM7sbGTcHUsl21ZOxMMpx5Hmu843yS ecaMUfidqhA95GPx9MmYGCbt/c1q0UqyN75PIDezmh8Iu0rMUkE/07ZiyXq8zBtY om67PplismgVD26y4QjP =Ia02 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4730840.EyteNpZzHA--