From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2A7138247 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C330E0A5B; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com (mail-oa0-f48.google.com [209.85.219.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A5F5E09E5 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id i11so318785oag.7 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:33:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=fNlK7PPEnrV/orskyjHG8NiZ2Q50/2Q8xFPkbdy6Tmk=; b=PW9Z08AdCX3yeMl2uGuT7PvZebDNMTXU4sNkG3bie0EA9s31ABRM8T5NS3TiwbjYxW 3/RvPPsk3W78fhs0QgchQ3WnybhigGMlNh3vJ0aq511NjJAjGtcmVJaUjmCoNdw0BEIp Ha86dP87pfQuALRkvVOUhcg37qBAZIcyV90ld8cBragwT84FSrzXokGQMYeP6lE77j4L 7rd0LD0uyU2QH4DQM4keLk5ddKKd6p1KuUkEnPApiU+Skfvv4ePi1xnObnmF0Rf8jd97 Lr1aRNdqkUmeWb/9y3c6rj5G/RdzCVvgninUdSt9tczLkyuu7lVZk10szIef6eFu68hI JFzg== X-Received: by 10.182.204.41 with SMTP id kv9mr2833062obc.78.1389738797608; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:33:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c6sm2427058oeu.6.2014.01.14.14.33.14 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:33:16 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by laptop (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:33:12 -0600 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:33:12 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy Message-ID: <20140114223312.GA3337@laptop.home> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20140114213719.GA2684@laptop.home> <52D5B2CA.5030407@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52D5B2CA.5030407@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: c160212a-6e12-4b50-9d20-281afff90d40 X-Archives-Hash: 35d6ecb80b82c3e4838a75f13bac5970 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:57:30PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/14/2014 04:37 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > >=20 > > 2. I would like to see the policy below applied to all arch's [2]. >=20 > [ ] Yup > [X] Nope The reverse of this would be to let maintainers stabilize on all arch's after 90 days, then they are allowed to remove all but the latest stable version. This isn't good though because maintainers would be stabilizing packages on arch's where they can't test. The stable tree is significantly behind because the arch teams are so short staffed, and this prooposal is an attempt to fix that. William --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlLVuygACgkQblQW9DDEZThQPACdESOHAe9xtPsruzyXy1ntKpLn W+AAn2SNUTn3UgXPIzaBHtZvm7uCbWc4 =U7HE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--