On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:15:37 +0700
"C. Bergström" <cbergstrom@pathscale.com> wrote:

> At the end of the day we have one codebase which is
> "engineered" and another which has "evolved".

Too broad generalization, too much assumption; both can be held as
meaning nothing compared to what "engineered" and "evolved" could
really be, but as with doing that, it gets a subjective nature.

In other words, the lack of context makes this statement meaningless.

What we're looking for is a well-engineered _and_ well-evolving
distribution, not just a well-engineered _or_ well-evolving package;
and thus there's a lot more to it to really use this as an argument.

-- 
With kind regards,

Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer

E-mail address  : TomWij@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key  : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2  ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D