From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2E2138247 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 08:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5306E0D4D; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 08:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E825DE0C88 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 08:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (77-254-165-29.adsl.inetia.pl [77.254.165.29]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BCFD33F75A; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 08:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 09:24:20 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: dirtyepic@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap? Message-ID: <20140112092420.6222fb44@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <20140112015347.5baf1bc0@caribou.gateway.pace.com> References: <20140112015347.5baf1bc0@caribou.gateway.pace.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/5OzWgflidvh51jSnMPHEkTJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: fc5cf410-59fa-4cd0-bfe9-98240ad156c0 X-Archives-Hash: a9e63458307dd9f4e4d89cdabf7745fd --Sig_/5OzWgflidvh51jSnMPHEkTJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2014-01-12, o godz. 01:53:47 Ryan Hill napisa=C5=82(a): > fortran: > Do we want to keep enabling fortran by default? The majority of users wi= ll > never get the urge to install a fortran package, and the fortran eclass h= andles > those that do. I think it should be treated as all the other optional > languages and disabled by default, but I'd like to know if there are other > opinions. Well, I'd say we should work on making 'other languages' buildable without rebuilding the whole giant gcc stack. Especially that the stacked build makes it impossible to use distcc at least partially. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/5OzWgflidvh51jSnMPHEkTJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJS0lFAXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOVpwQAN5SK+Wwb0R/E0/ex4saNqhh PbgvCGFi6CAesDm8ho5QOUmnBilHEmQbgQ5PvAiXc3681/FcCoj54LoWhyLMBsDy 8YG5SqD/1HiviBQTD3ZrFefBv3U23HGhdwL8ZhjuXAYIm1yO4PK7jZnddz2BSnmk 6If73At4iYNVqYG60TmhSYRqzI9UQLssXOCRr5TEZO3hjbdsjj0TG5D7zBb4LIYL BGOSrvxa84wtJHiW4IaT5f/FSnjxFcu6w6pORa9F1Suc1BMG+d38yssSHt30kqrE Ba08a5YCeMi4cGule9sPhxJsGxaI6mA0Q6eYNeRDLWgahGqvu4m0Un8by8AtSCJK /inleXvVso/chhBt4NdAn6JoGTq/1ulx4ffCxZkXuGePa6AuxCSRsYTVmz9KVtRX 50Psh9lw+KYxkXTMvzLRtx3UMN/gy5gkcKd5Y4UHvsTnpkfF8LiTbd+s5fZ7X3dB qoMykUK+MRGZDQAq2IG8fHIuxE0ZCSVlldwF8rtF+XKijFeW64kGFXA1ZH9bxiCE /gRG4ZQtI1cr6WQ0XiFQNsZHxSSkQwA50YgeOgDblnkCuOTSZl5SxJeOY15aIx7I dyHFEKg4kj4ja+3UjHpvYMDOcmWOytSoN75artn2z8tpfuwNRb+7CFdXA1INKs5S Bf5XP/Qs7sJFZsrySqAC =kfdq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/5OzWgflidvh51jSnMPHEkTJ--