From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAD1138247 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95196E0E62; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66D5CE0E52 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x55so2193919wes.36 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:32:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=6j9UFkj4kzy/0F8GuQpDWJH5EZ0pMwW6OEgV7dB5sSw=; b=uqTzvMM9nhQLVIH6pbjQFWdl11X4f7+GiyJ/G6KOrwI6vQUDLT+xHAW+7uWO+q7qDj 30yp4vd1gOJTeo15yxztdrSseOBAQRh6E18sNhXOv7seXNmQrDFMWnC6hGriOc9GKkXi qSPdYgP0a+GC+FIOUpaRgLLDEapo2VsSySbbDkyt1yVyYBHvSuF1BQmqVdlW7p/MQmIG kPv0VhM1jiTHvt6cs6QUUZF78B/Lc0BDFTbg38RA7K+NlEQDFxEPIBvYkRumnPz2QPBT cw+H3Dk13hP1wejdmy5SIKQt8zAF+P25SnaIgqyFAZX683tSeNBHEXcdwUthZd2jaU6b Vrlw== X-Received: by 10.194.173.163 with SMTP id bl3mr10140497wjc.10.1389378742217; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:32:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cpc3-broo7-2-0-cust157.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.30.224.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f7sm4809751wjb.7.2014.01.10.10.32.21 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:32:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:21:12 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS v2 Message-ID: <20140110182112.100e8953@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <52d031ec.e48b700a.2293.ffffb513@mx.google.com> References: <52d02b83.4a1b980a.1e8d.ffffb56b@mx.google.com> <8864472.OZjXC1DmSv@kailua> <52d031ec.e48b700a.2293.ffffb513@mx.google.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/6iHt1zLAqhpMhqbMzz=LWpE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 1497d542-c14d-4564-a72c-7318f9239da3 X-Archives-Hash: e3627c5c53a08c967c6bd2001efd19c6 --Sig_/6iHt1zLAqhpMhqbMzz=LWpE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:46:18 +0400 Igor wrote: > And one more goal - without PortageQOS you're forever stuck with > the legacy portage design. >=20 > If the team ever decides to change Portage you'll need feedback > on how the new portage works to patch it quickly in case there are > troubles. It's too risky to touch portage right now. Everyone > understands that this is a kamikaze job.=20 Uh, no. We already know lots of things that are wrong with the Portage design. We also know how to fix those things. Neither of those is the sticking point. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/6iHt1zLAqhpMhqbMzz=LWpE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlLQOhsACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGUdQCcCOnx850W+619vG87tIb52aKe PV8An3i2CSO/PUVBqHeKtt7PyFK0bsBd =MMyD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/6iHt1zLAqhpMhqbMzz=LWpE--