From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70658138247 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 23:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FDCEE0CA8; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 23:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50C3CE0CA0 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 23:29:05 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7771jWiJc= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-165-192.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.165.192]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 32.17 AUTH) with (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPSA id R0347bq09NSuBff for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:28:56 +0100 (CET) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] To enable ssp default in Gcc the toolchain.eclass need some changes. Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:30:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.25-gentoo; KDE/4.12.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <7554031.Sacz2dxc8i@laptop1.gw.ume.nu> <52CF1080.7010400@gentoo.org> <20140109172603.659c630f@caribou.gateway.pace.com> In-Reply-To: <20140109172603.659c630f@caribou.gateway.pace.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2382774.pdGoD7NmIc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201401100030.11205.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 2a48732a-86cb-4d1d-b495-2c1e5973c522 X-Archives-Hash: e29ec62803f008b1385c40e96bf52ae8 --nextPart2382774.pdGoD7NmIc Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2014, 00:26:03 schrieb Ryan Hill: > > > Please avoid "noblah" use flags. > >=20 > > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/use-flags/ > >=20 > > ssp flag that defaults to on is fine. >=20 > This flag already exists and has always worked this way.=20 "already exists and has always worked this way" is not really a good argume= nt.=20 The rest of the tree sticks to guidelines, so why not here? > We don't have USE defaults yet. Now if you had said "we can't use USE defaults yet since current ebuilds ar= e=20 still at EAPI=3D0"... that would have been slightly more informative. :) (Yes I've seen that there is work going on, and I think that's good. Being= =20 careful when modernizing makes sense here of course.) =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart2382774.pdGoD7NmIc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJSzzEDXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwNzlCRDk4QzA4RENBRkYzQUEwRjQzMDlF QkU2QTMzNkJFMTkwMzlDAAoJEOvmoza+GQOcc44P/0cGTBnu5dmWlTqtEYVjP8Qy xuDnmvb5KSSF7C558MfguxA8ca3IIGG6ImN8xcPHv7i6M1HWuVRPjqeWNa/DsQ6B MH+/vCwsEyOvz/l3UStsevozTx8rhLUy9P4dE11bOARYjjHO4QHbQvT3fddPJyqo Uow3r6NYoy2dUBVl0zqNGQVikjM2q0As90Vtb/ttuqyGoFuIg/ljK9Xj0fcmaE7/ uL1JzTsIdM2s2RjrUUg2p4xFA8vrf+r1N6kS/0kt3YzbaWIXzM3q7qEjJ4M3a7dY Nb9nOg5EVrNBGJ6HclXTah1iJwCKNM+KGJl7m0dKu/XwilvoUIcgXKR8KosnjuBd 3dZyqrCeVvSiCyWGHnb72VMj+eC6MZj/Xi90dL1Dvs91lSMhYEjyzOplqAPqzIy0 FyI8QiaZ6nkXMZrtnKg/gawgODDLV987oOJNWokRQq7ZlhUJFnzq6YyDzdfSre3I d+KcA+YUvMj+CaroWDq3hvSsEAOtHJYaYNk2WappI2UOTulYF1HulsLy53+ojR4U 1LzDnQCKmag14NLg5Q5bRR1hGVIOjA4ogLieJoNnoXJ98E1KloNW881X/WLzJOAl 5HA43Ap5FV54HSYonBkXdGvuX6K1VtfOn5EgcqNHDBVJGPEKd1B/jPSmjALmfjKx 7v7AO0GEhVqmjFWNuboX =WJXZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2382774.pdGoD7NmIc--