From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E786138247 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 23:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39462E0CCD; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 23:41:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D671E0BCD for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 23:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id uz6so4026668obc.6 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:41:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=kfQ5OacXJ3b3LZhy9xGzIzjBpc8VUTpcKTVSBAcfmwA=; b=Q3ZVMDS1kyCtRevaSmc4bbv5LO2Yd9wNmdwS9XmX93MHX054fuvhmSR1kRcaTy8rmx F0Egvm4HXU5cigqnPnD5dBEZG9W0EUFL4FNYjuXu2scctd7a3A0gnt3ooC01DHu4ov/A ewWCZev7mu9SyKmBDuniwVfWnBM6V9RwFwgccqeVCFoo5oMPoKQIc5f6C0RAOdSevsM+ 47P3q7H6xdh7z1Zy3fl/ORPwfaRixa7j0e1/TNEENYpBRzYdMK1R9oLRellEY1iRGf8i n1aGVtgrv+gaVTv6giz8DAs/v0LwmWYRPklowNCt8CDGdLPqI1pBGJ98kZN0Uf1ylvCH WgdQ== X-Received: by 10.182.153.226 with SMTP id vj2mr4671132obb.26.1389310873456; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:41:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n3sm8211582oep.2.2014.01.09.15.41.09 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:41:11 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by laptop (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:41:08 -0600 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:41:08 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] To enable ssp default in Gcc the toolchain.eclass need some changes. Message-ID: <20140109234108.GA8840@laptop.home> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <7554031.Sacz2dxc8i@laptop1.gw.ume.nu> <52CF1080.7010400@gentoo.org> <20140109172603.659c630f@caribou.gateway.pace.com> <201401100030.11205.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201401100030.11205.dilfridge@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: cdb6a790-5cf7-42b3-865b-1b3c3b65f8a6 X-Archives-Hash: 12bd80bf13e500aa0a04ab25045a0d01 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:30:04AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2014, 00:26:03 schrieb Ryan Hill: > > > > > Please avoid "noblah" use flags. > > >=20 > > > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/use-flags/ > > >=20 > > > ssp flag that defaults to on is fine. > >=20 > > This flag already exists and has always worked this way.=20 >=20 > "already exists and has always worked this way" is not really a good argu= ment.=20 > The rest of the tree sticks to guidelines, so why not here? Agreed again. Saying that something has always worked a certain way in the past is not justification for keeping it working that way, especially when there are preferred ways of doing the same thing that are different. > > We don't have USE defaults yet. >=20 > Now if you had said "we can't use USE defaults yet since current ebuilds = are=20 > still at EAPI=3D0"... that would have been slightly more informative. :) >=20 > (Yes I've seen that there is work going on, and I think that's good. Bein= g=20 > careful when modernizing makes sense here of course.) Right, I thought someone had updated toolchain.eclass to use a modern eapi, but I hadn't seen any more on that in some time. What's the latest? Thanks, William --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlLPM5QACgkQblQW9DDEZTijOgCfZnzZA+Svna+GE4tvQM5HyFN5 wugAnjapKlNzIpwOo2Z9RpcRPe5OLtx8 =hVwA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd--