From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964D9138247 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F5C1E0CF1; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 536E5E0CD7 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B4E33F68E for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:02:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.081 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.081 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.958, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.121, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FJ1a3Yr9AkHE for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E422F33F546 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W1PYc-0000Xh-Mb for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 01:02:38 +0100 Received: from 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([71.17.69.121]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 01:02:38 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic by 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 01:02:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] To enable ssp default in Gcc the toolchain.eclass need some changes. Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 18:12:00 -0600 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: <20140109181200.6c1ca1e8@caribou.gateway.pace.com> References: <7554031.Sacz2dxc8i@laptop1.gw.ume.nu> <52CF1080.7010400@gentoo.org> <20140109172603.659c630f@caribou.gateway.pace.com> <201401100030.11205.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20140109234108.GA8840@laptop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/MpbQwDgAURX75Z6EWcTc.tj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 76256668-e23a-42f8-9210-9c68a70a6500 X-Archives-Hash: 2508f7e19cab2e40e109de4bcc013ad2 --Sig_/MpbQwDgAURX75Z6EWcTc.tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:41:08 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:30:04AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2014, 00:26:03 schrieb Ryan Hill: > > > > > > > Please avoid "noblah" use flags. > > > >=20 > > > > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/use-flags/ > > > >=20 > > > > ssp flag that defaults to on is fine. > > >=20 > > > This flag already exists and has always worked this way.=20 > >=20 > > "already exists and has always worked this way" is not really a good > > argument. The rest of the tree sticks to guidelines, so why not here? >=20 > Agreed again. Saying that something has always worked a certain way in > the past is not justification for keeping it working that way, > especially when there are preferred ways of doing the same thing that > are different. Sure, I'm just pointing out that nothing is changing here. It sounded like people were objecting to the addition of a new no* flag. I agree we should change them once we can but that shouldn't block this patch. > > > We don't have USE defaults yet. > >=20 > > Now if you had said "we can't use USE defaults yet since current ebuilds > > are still at EAPI=3D0"... that would have been slightly more informativ= e. :) > >=20 > > (Yes I've seen that there is work going on, and I think that's good. Be= ing=20 > > careful when modernizing makes sense here of course.) >=20 > Right, I thought someone had updated toolchain.eclass to use a modern > eapi, but I hadn't seen any more on that in some time. What's the > latest? I did, but I can't start using new features until I bring all the ebuilds u= p to a minimum EAPI. I'm going to start that this weekend. --=20 Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 --Sig_/MpbQwDgAURX75Z6EWcTc.tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSzzrQAAoJEO04vUmVeoRjYT4IAKwX9x4qEcPgFhIreKeZ9vHi rLtTf1akVKf+k+f/kDifHWdifICp3qF/bFBxTBT8HIYWJ8O6tiFtljK6J719rQJv ushojUy+MDp64+/nDniH+LgjX7jbRtyBtrio8pRDNAu785MGNdk4R94+RoYutDJw hi9dCvEtZhJTAnhXHy011NWylSB5BWCxdcyIX/mfgA7o6ZGFoLJBKdHKFy2w2ER8 dN7szN2qfC9C5susfs/as8E2nRlOjyJoUmZ/rp4dDqPQGBUa+dcHYZ3SZEGz+dqF kzs16ZqMR+jbY62ci/rViTAisPLeavLq5PDlrZRaHy4jR5G2F2LehCwUIkWXI7k= =mx++ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/MpbQwDgAURX75Z6EWcTc.tj--