From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21B5138247 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 976C6E0D53; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3647E0D4C for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04FF33F6DE for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:20:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 15:20:59 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.1; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <1386598800.12112.7.camel@belkin5> <52A636D9.7050904@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <52A636D9.7050904@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1955289.5QbHIJhyd7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201401091521.00050.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 4cfa26c3-c929-4ee0-b11c-3385738ce280 X-Archives-Hash: e2574abe0c4f1657ba49ebd1362ad6be --nextPart1955289.5QbHIJhyd7 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 09 December 2013 16:32:09 Markos Chandras wrote: > On 12/09/2013 02:21 PM, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >> Hello > >>=20 > >> Is pam team still active? I wonder about this as, recently, we have > >> needed to go ahead and fix some bugs related, for example, with pambase > >> and pam_ssh > >>=20 > >> Thanks for the info :) >=20 > So I guess it's time to call for maintainers or we should consider > merging this herd with another one (base?) to avoid unattended bugs for > a long time. well, the sep herd was kind of by design ... i didn't want it cluttering up= =20 base-system@ and it is super convenient to abdicate all PAM decisions to a= =20 single herd. =2Dmike --nextPart1955289.5QbHIJhyd7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJSzwSsAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBWDgQAJXW+nI2qvVyD0RiM6neo0N6 W2KjtnVHBdq1GQDIre9a7+lNOLc47j1eKgcqRhJHygVWYw/Ju46vQungwZ/8tIl0 UgkLKU2Q+brtXOXQOAIAN3Xn18jFFSWahqqe2hDnyXvKgNN3Oc4eRpi8lwF/XD2k uR1qboGF9IeWDN5k7M9nXljFCFm1ME/XE2qtd1VwpIsQA2ud+ota/FFjL/f2ekZm XQmJazrTmj5pF6MxK7V5oLbjs3zoKlBTk2QFgC+JsdNk7SX4Hn2Y1cvmUxJvcn44 06vTFsysew0ogeIb9mMY61qGOtJS0384eQGcPKD5gNeB5wSCmsdw6JPh2Ji/71BI lGZuME/E++T7ow7yyqds8mE5BVpt4KvBridtBcAQZnkIeS7hHvo9xP/wfJd1yD+I SXYCoiA+3fwmgObRrCrjcwVAQpICavjRhfykuBvXlS0ZiLOa0G/UJ1s9QfhudAgA E8NlEiwayzMEvnAvKCy8O1ZSLN3u+TU9vg2uvgdHBW7F+4O/n4moHRuSak9tm+ps 4O83Pxy85ROzsd3X73PHwcHQwC0kNs72UZOPwRagbVpFs3TzLzFriqi6ZlPoABns Ga707oobJ5+wbMRQHcnerrVues1RiCpJWq94PTkSzB4ZST4YyGHl6bLxKdstB+kV Ycrwnw9EnC/c5yOd79ud =pNVv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1955289.5QbHIJhyd7--