From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7567D138247 for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 02:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FED2E0AD4; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 02:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13914E0ACC for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 02:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD0E33F15B for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 02:51:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.308 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.308 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.757, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.549, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GEzAUah5_7hM for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 02:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EC6C33F48B for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 02:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzdo6-0000jc-8F for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 03:51:18 +0100 Received: from 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([71.17.69.121]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 03:51:18 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic by 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 03:51:18 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new global USE flag "srcdist" Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 21:00:39 -0600 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: <20140104210039.295d5523@caribou.gateway.pace.com> References: <21188.38566.180273.751353@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20140102065006.59a2bad9@caribou.gateway.pace.com> <52C58F8E.9050005@gentoo.org> <20140102172822.617e6452@gentp.lnet> <21189.39321.229948.547287@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20140102180258.477e0963@gentp.lnet> <21189.44366.754407.921500@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20140102151120.30a26041@caribou.gateway.pace.com> <20140102160722.6abbffd6@caribou.gateway.pace.com> <20140102165321.7c0a5b46@caribou.gateway.pace.com> <21189.64493.797568.198088@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/qwx+6FFLRjX7QoXqJWSFg.f"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 400a0d62-8f78-490f-a6bb-dd6ad5c43172 X-Archives-Hash: 6eb893d72b8e4be23f82c716a7ec008e --Sig_/qwx+6FFLRjX7QoXqJWSFg.f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 00:53:17 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Ryan Hill wrote: >=20 > > In case it's helpful here's what FOSSology[1] has to say about some > > common packages that people have uploaded to their demo server. >=20 > I don't get your point here. The licenses of a package have to be > checked in any case. Why would it be more complicated to check the > full set of files in the tarball, instead of the subset of files that > the package will actually install? I was trying to see how many packages contain licenses that aren't already = in LICENSES, assuming these would be ones that we would have to have a srcdist= USE flag for. Rich said that is was rare. I'm finding every package I've chec= ked so far would need one. Either way I don't care what you do. --=20 Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 --Sig_/qwx+6FFLRjX7QoXqJWSFg.f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSyMrdAAoJEO04vUmVeoRjPaUH/RAcfPX4XNA4At9pEnEAaKjO ivWxK5X5jykJ4sn/urI0Mxk7+6MsFTV01xxvBhXaeAeJC9iMHRbMqqKowvrBBb8N C7tJ1bQnOR38o2xB2T2Oplq+QDMhwLETTm786FvyE8jYAvKxsCVX7Jt5Km1BSSI+ 9vjGbCRIqiySY8UP8awUa41QoF5ugU648rQ0dPIvmO8EAUoIfM/ucFg44Pj2gIpK kXvaKfnJ9qu2CG15Chq8bR956dP/ZRt00cSYYpsC+vLan1SYKJ5LIwB66FebWfWx uTeN6rVZlKrkWHTFsmrRTrbNfeEBr3tWHwv6q7ocK7B+ML2dSbfuS5XabCyPafI= =hGDg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/qwx+6FFLRjX7QoXqJWSFg.f--