From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4C9138247 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 15:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8B72E0ADA; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 15:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7117E0AD5 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 15:42:25 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :I3kQYkG6f/ML/Lb0bAYFCBt+SpICkd7E+UrA1ycmip9RDA+sU5X+JL1z/vOs4lWRwJM= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from porto.localnet (p5B310086.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.49.0.134]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 32.17 DYNA|AUTH) with (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id f03badpBSFgENth for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 16:42:14 +0100 (CET) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/umurmur: metadata.xml ChangeLog Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 16:44:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.17-gentoo; KDE/4.12.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <20131225095020.A91BE2004C@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20131226132724.6b9477af@googlemail.com> <52BEEA2D.2020103@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <52BEEA2D.2020103@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1799151.erOjL8xe4G"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201312281644.39489.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 7205cb6e-edc2-4839-886f-d8ff2a53943a X-Archives-Hash: c5a45df463f0032c5826a6d6fb0f9968 --nextPart1799151.erOjL8xe4G Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >> That's what I call "ignoring the rest". You do not communicate, > >> you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff. > >=20 > > That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able > > to address. You should raise this issue with them rather than > > accusing each other on the lists. >=20 > I completely agree with this. I feel that this thread is a sign that > there is a problem on how the new QA communicates problems with the > developers that cause them. I read the entire thread and I still don't > think there is an agreement on who broke the tree and why. Would a > private discussion be better before going publicly with accusations? Introducing repoman warnings deliberately is wrong. Point.=20 QA can do trivial fixes. Point.=20 None of these two points needs any discussion. =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart1799151.erOjL8xe4G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJSvvHhAAoJEJS/30SErRQvYeIP/iySMuDldzb3S869lOBrxZK2 qpsPMvHm8mJgs7KpBhRunW/5oKGwxaomKgxIx0vF00rw2JoeeaQCJ58w/kvT1PcJ sbDqPnAUHSB8RrSlP3TCPXJ5J7/KHO9QzbmZ7UdgrIJjGheAT/77z2N6s6IznPp9 ioSv9IeCjLBt9Rwza7cXjGrCi3cyJaB6bBacWVrwwsQEXlVOujmbV3DbbW7e7UOT foiWBHWgk6PEp/Jq7PeCB1HHu4smMdUudEAEBper0fwSWhb8cQtpHEEor5QA2LkG tGIABpd3Hrmdvw97mY4O2cWC1Kgx3YX0O64hQTTg4WCySctpVctXu7h53wzuCmpK Ux4CSzBNv/qH2sNcSSGR4aLXfeHMKRXXsbV+pzP+9xefZPREOe7eWojyZA0kP72E U3FvPDNSd5gz6uJ9GzwPyvlw2sqgW9JDo84ww58x/KeWoWcZJzrwMbsIf5WhaYvz 1gXfrAwZAZv4+gZAyxT0/2eWXmNq/ROIx8O/KNYwLcpsolIcCg0AMu1EyzKPyl/n gHDXE6JaVduCf+GWMGd4UNR3F15idbjBbK3sRBKqbc9mjnu4EM0Z2TsTickDuI3G VzTr9oBl+wuSg3Qneo2lfV2F8K6Yn9yUqnH1k2nTWQ3uPC3SpoRZY5WRDSdl15x6 WWii4Hu4OgnWsX4l+sF0 =6XD8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1799151.erOjL8xe4G--