From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB47138247 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:50:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2581E0A4F; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDAD6E0A03 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFB633F5FB for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:50:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 12.308 X-Spam-Level: ************ X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=12.308 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=10.011, FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2=1.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=0.865, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.565, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMhC_4v793qN for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6494433F55B for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VwG0c-0008Ov-Ha for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 19:50:14 +0100 Received: from 208.69.246.225 ([208.69.246.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 19:50:14 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic by 208.69.246.225 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 19:50:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/umurmur: metadata.xml ChangeLog Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:59:39 -0600 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: <20131226125939.082376a8@caribou> References: <20131225095020.A91BE2004C@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <52BACEE8.1010006@gentoo.org> <52BB17D4.6040907@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/MIhK6u.YK3zOWG=YkFwgg89"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.69.246.225 X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.2-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 394eed90-ccfb-486b-bf51-23bbbccbb5bd X-Archives-Hash: a67f600245414a29b5030376dd180f5e --Sig_/MIhK6u.YK3zOWG=YkFwgg89 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 18:37:24 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 12/25/2013 01:26 PM, hasufell wrote: >=20 > > You are interfering with my workflow and I already told you why I kept > > the useflag, so stop reverting my commits after I told you the reasons > > in a private mail. > >=20 > > QA is more than just running repoman and doing random commits on other > > peoples ebuilds. (besides that you already managed to break the > > Manifest of this stable package last time) > >=20 >=20 > Soooooooooooo .... >=20 > 25 Dec 2013; Julian Ospald metadata.xml: > revert pseudo-QA commit >=20 > 25 Dec 2013; Patrick Lauer metadata.xml: > Remove unneeded useflag description from metadata.xml >=20 > 23 Dec 2013; Julian Ospald metadata.xml: > add unused useflag since the breakage is expected to be temporary >=20 >=20 > AutoRepomanReport for Wed Dec 25 17:22:16 UTC 2013 > AutoRepomanWarning: media-sound/umurmur/metadata.xml: unused > local USE-description: 'polarssl' >=20 >=20 > Why the bleeping bleep are you KNOWINGLY introducing a useless > regression that serves no purpose but to annoy some people, and then add > a passive-agressive Changelog entry? >=20 > Fix your workflow, man ... and don't cause useless warning spam if you > can avoid it. Oh FFS it's a USE flag. You guys have bigger fish to fry. --=20 Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 --Sig_/MIhK6u.YK3zOWG=YkFwgg89 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSvHyfAAoJEO04vUmVeoRjFScH/R1JWkBZPNAnJgie770VYWEO Rey97jONDZ2pU29a+SbvZwsDbH94mZW6pSokbiMqN+L+AeuBZ++Cz1ZUe1W9Za9O xGggWvP3R7wPEITdLYPEjhXNXXl8RrcocBspP6ifGDZT4XsjtMzHUXw9x56yxuY1 9IM1lb3huIdjfW2rT6nYwOgcWEAhNBB0pOOkeaMxqfufv1pDeJT2Ayj5/y9zrnqB 1ZpgGS+zxLihYsXILo3DJIoAqVorIf1mTCYKLgqaM8xN5RMFk1OjmCygrPQ+YEPz 5h6eSsHVBvDI2DIK7rjRWLi0OMnoEHjv+83pACdxOGoUrdJuLbsQfLHRkCy+RNU= =a6vw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/MIhK6u.YK3zOWG=YkFwgg89--