From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9287E138247 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19263E0AFC; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f171.google.com (mail-vc0-f171.google.com [209.85.220.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36DD9E0A95 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ik5so2240902vcb.16 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 13:57:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=3oWISAiEhfaOWoEolMKMSnWzwouk5jk0sPBtJetiQfE=; b=Hew0hOvIihTSKpNdoBqDRj9ULderDGejyE2wr4BkZA2gFXgk1/xKveeELiqGnFejE9 V1kv0fac/nux9oQETusyTGQOrvnzpxFN4vsBzTWTdX3l1v93PmyGxBc0fTZTegGXcke4 mHfcUvlFTXt+wb5eix2NIMaoKs7vw3yFPkSLg2wLO1UKZjiJ7fzVbd5mdZyly+aAe+Xn waZHqgLRRz6TlAUPknGq0VZEJhku3DhA4fWD3Pv3TvbjYU+ZVAyQFgPTZBoYX5hY8G+l HsdYsogSgsTjhejzZmoiIqexdDtDEElMNjadXDkuw1aC2xO2dJQ+SfO3B7zx56fF2bI6 3rTA== X-Received: by 10.58.232.228 with SMTP id tr4mr468313vec.34.1387058228409; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 13:57:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kf19sm12285619vdb.5.2013.12.14.13.57.05 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Dec 2013 13:57:07 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:57:04 -0600 Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:57:04 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: jmbsvicetto@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Message-ID: <20131214215704.GA27569@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, jmbsvicetto@gentoo.org References: <20131203211130.GA31972@linux1> <52A2B788.3040409@gentoo.org> <20131208222552.GA22567@linux1> <52A5D89A.4080506@gentoo.org> <52A62062.9030109@gentoo.org> <20131211025755.GA23458@linux1> <20131214201347.GA27029@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 9450f518-6ea3-4dba-9928-3cf197fe21ba X-Archives-Hash: a3a17c9d0975334c4d992e31ad4218d6 --uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Content-Disposition: inline --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 08:47:01PM +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > OK, I see what you mean. > To be clear, I'm not ready to have a stage3 without netifrc. If / when we= =20 > update catalyst so that the new stage3 is the sum of @system and=20 > additional packages, we can move netifrc to that list. Actually I'm not even sure how necessary that kind of update is. I didn't quite follow what the reasoning against my second proposal was. Once openrc-0.12.4 is stable everywhere it is going to go stable, I want to add virtual/network-manager to the tree. This would contain a list of network manager providers. I think adding it to the tree is good, because we have other virtuals for multiple packages that perform the same function -- virtual/logger, virtual/mta, etc. Once that is done, we could easily add it to @system then I would drop the netifrc use flag. That would take care of the situation if netifrc was the default provider. Then, if you decide to add the function you are talking about to catalyst, we could look into dropping virtual/network-manager from @system. I'll attach the ebuild below so everyone sees it. William --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="network-manager-0.ebuild" # Copyright 1999-2013 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: $ EAPI=5 DESCRIPTION="virtual for network managers" HOMEPAGE="" SRC_URI="" LICENSE="" SLOT="0" KEYWORDS="~x86" IUSE="" DEPEND="" RDEPEND=" || ( net-misc/netifrc >=sys-apps/openrc-0.12[newnet]