From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-63898-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEED13827E
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:04:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BECE4E0B5C;
	Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:04:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com (mail-vc0-f174.google.com [209.85.220.174])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3ADCE0B14
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:04:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id id10so1705187vcb.5
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:04:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        bh=Hn+JWAM+Hu4Jpak3Yq7hJIsZ9Nm4Ul0tzQry65S0YXk=;
        b=WRT6/OgFbE8PBEBxobki7DZ2pQATjQXxKn2XWBuHwfap+M4Ep50/B4CBpE7wyDDn5h
         VTy2Bul+FX3Q3mrUmr6HPz9dIbQCVhtW0YVroL3swt4cp1KiniXrHGEO2CVbHm9OQOfJ
         jr+0VZkVivhwss4AsrM6As/TmTBe+PmEOk0YIHE1zjsnTJ3ft/B8yDJi0oyGi9RszN33
         8T3bwF/jgoPHKZohD4kyYCepY8+hUN7S5os92F3+riuoJC2oXZuhnYfL0gwAEzbmhlx8
         KVXdLDtRg1QXTVk6IaFKYdYZh9a1rz/hP6hmJGpHrG3suuvbMGPk0LTOaR4m70W5kVT+
         bsyQ==
X-Received: by 10.58.232.228 with SMTP id tr4mr2213545vec.34.1386972242785;
        Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:04:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xa5sm5997710vdc.7.2013.12.13.14.04.00
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:03:57 -0600
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:03:57 -0600
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC
Message-ID: <20131213220357.GA18419@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20131211204110.GA30092@linux1>
 <52A9DA57.6070700@plaimi.net>
 <CAJ0EP43QmB3pBZM_GCXLyVL_Bs7xp_Vm14CodGrJHCUGA7sT7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131213172307.GA6734@linux1>
 <pan$67419$1d97ec3e$94eb0d65$464114ce@cox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <pan$67419$1d97ec3e$94eb0d65$464114ce@cox.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: b70534e9-cced-4e63-9ef8-b57584f19d92
X-Archives-Hash: b02187624128488df307da34299f4eab


--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:53:59PM +0000, Duncan wrote:
> William Hubbs posted on Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:23:07 -0600 as excerpted:
>=20
> >  There are reasons to run the rc binary directly; this is how you should
> >  be changing runlevels.
>=20
> ???
>=20
> init 9 (or telinit 9, yes, I have a runlevel 9, basic, just gpm as it=20
> happens) isn't appropriate?

Well, I have to qualify what I said.

There are two "runlevels" you have to worry about.
The OpenRC runlevels are named; you can switch between these using rc
directly, for example:

rc default
rc single
rc nonetwork

The sysvinit runlevels are the numbered ones, and these are mapped to
things to run, like 3 is mapped to /sbin/rc default. I believe runlevel
3 is mapped to other things in inittab, so, I guess the best answer is,
it depends on what you are wanting to change. Does that make sense?

William


--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlKrhE0ACgkQblQW9DDEZTiO2gCfXifiAgR9r5Eqq5kf2j0Kvy6i
FBAAoJtUdCdTh7qML2RdkPUIxmP6dEEL
=iE8O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--