From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8F013827E for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0373E0A81; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com (mail-vc0-f175.google.com [209.85.220.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB2CE0A6A for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id ld13so372253vcb.6 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:15:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=1zML3TdeblBmqN5ARrMEvD2B4TX2GzJwj3ThJhGKXjw=; b=B+qQJ17akJe7pkhk6J6MnH8HSlO2zjoaGJptWQTcBGZgNUlxDABJH+NpgO8w2H10xE c76YWdL3ItIweAUJK6BKzM3S0mja/7qq6WAVqoDelquLipvUiIFkCga5Z/K4HDbSN5o1 Bs3s09msQTIgOjZjTDFueaxRvcS72dtKWq75tKI/dz1DGeJ5nAYIpG9z0i30lDd7Wy8i QmWvDY8sCRcSVj/2xyjJcXzX1T7n6eh8i1Fdo+oPqEVnX8HOOq46Kd9QL33PrqmA93+I R2Eb6fdmKbmSojknYsbGmg0cz3phMj/HKxb7R1wKZEOyQN2iekbMRjrFiay70TvajLZA T+UA== X-Received: by 10.220.95.139 with SMTP id d11mr4178307vcn.21.1386861311955; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:15:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kf19sm32990762vdb.5.2013.12.12.07.15.08 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:15:09 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:15:07 -0600 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:15:07 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC Message-ID: <20131212151507.GA4043@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20131211204110.GA30092@linux1> <52A96896.4090102@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52A96896.4090102@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 18b1e3a5-7179-48be-a44a-2813edbfb9f5 X-Archives-Hash: 3298a9e1d1463fcaf1c6e7841c587ed9 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:41:10AM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: >=20 > On 11/12/13 22:41, William Hubbs wrote: > > All, > > > > We got a request from Debian to rename the "rc" binary of OpenRC due to > > a naming conflict they have. They have a port of the at&t plan 9 shell, > > which has a binary named "rc" as well[1]. >=20 > which we ship as app-shells/rc and rename 'rc' to 'rcsh' for unique name >=20 > just saying This is a separate topic, but maybe we should stop renaming it after a transition period. I am not comfortable with renaming upstream binaries at the distro level. William --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlKp0vsACgkQblQW9DDEZTh+awCgtPSRx0Du8c06DbgSOzGKGFW3 RpQAoLRlm34W9WYJ9AtwaHYJ0J5uJL6W =AnSy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd--