From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6626A13827E for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C061E0B84; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE41E0A63 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:23:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shanghai.paradoxon.rec (p4FDA96FD.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.218.150.253]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: polynomial-c) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F167833F2B1; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:23:18 +0100 From: Lars Wendler To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: dastergon@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Message-ID: <20131212102318.5c2d55c1@shanghai.paradoxon.rec> In-Reply-To: References: <1386708905.1931.2.camel@belkin5> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/T2O=_1/nIXu9RdsXb_X2aWQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 38eb16e3-e859-40dd-8fd9-9aa46736e740 X-Archives-Hash: 47671c7ae373f644187a2b03b202b5aa --Sig_/T2O=_1/nIXu9RdsXb_X2aWQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Wed, 11 Dec 2013 23:42:03 +0000 schrieb Pavlos Ratis : > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >=20 > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197625#c14 > > > > This has reminded me that maybe we should switch to cronie from > > vixie-cron as default and recommended cron provider in Handbook. > > Last time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died while cronie > > forked it fixing some bugs :/ > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > I am all for it. I wouldn't say that vixie-cron is dead since it is > still functional, however I would rather say that it is outdated. > In my opinion, cronie, unlike the other cron variants is the most > reliable. Also, many other distributions like Arch[1] and openSUSE[2] > have already switched from vixie-cron to cronie. >=20 > Note: We need a new entry for cronie to our Cron wiki page [3] >=20 > [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/cron > [2] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Cron_replace > [3] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Cron >=20 > Pavlos I've added cronie to our Wiki cron page. --=20 Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer --Sig_/T2O=_1/nIXu9RdsXb_X2aWQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJSqYCSAAoJEPiazRVxLXTFYgsP/0Ncm8t5ihkjIL+o2yHq+IWE oR5IsGGXG9M71qLAvL/IioJbfW4Fhxb005knGnXvVjiMiQOmYg9IgsDMt0xb8kEF 1gS1JqQXfkTXH3bTTHG4bfO8f0o757zPIGueGfD+9HkNQuz1+6w0uct2fowvxGHY S1kn5mjIn04mmxQRvWvUT/cWmF6EsM7iTQiyEI/1EOdMp4ivl0M9K9FJsiPM7rBk qFT7Kzruj/ZUvY6/2k+R6aePsN36mY4RxCEtTcq/D50z+s/aIvKz6M+CobiQqU+Q kJPHFZ/ezPMdKAjwxc2Stmf0gEoQ17a0sBZ7BCgX6cmtsxC+mfh58r4Ah65jkwGc XvL09rzYFHysvZjUor1khgXatoz25W8yVEee5x3o8dUIxcrSEaeBAcISw9vB4VzG 7KZbgC6uVij8LP8Isy8+TULvAuijAOV06YgWNeg2LvbgvE4dsoKFB/Z6QoHDI1fa c1FQ/470Wk3zvZJW5CYuw5V/SZwzhll6049sGbYlLVp/b6m2VqjB7H7X8nlYpXKb y1AKpdAyXf3UorcN53hxU0WRYQKZnBwoMzwqkDrukC+YHHkWO/iEw7CpPhpxE23G vQSiQufeTA6CRocgTNpKU2nK/PD9cnVaxSNdx6avywdRX6dmS3qSTWbHGqYqybom 5pMAlrGcfgryfTeY8PI6 =ed6p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/T2O=_1/nIXu9RdsXb_X2aWQ--