From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E370E13827E for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 22:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AAA9E0B26; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 22:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f50.google.com (mail-vb0-f50.google.com [209.85.212.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A91C1E0AF4 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 22:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id w18so2136086vbj.37 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:50:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=gfnu6brDCXPVQqy0n++yQ29BjAtJUGHv8JH2V1/VXU8=; b=daeN8lJs7VaIduFlJhjDk0C5c/wjFavEx4y+3VF2PgAOMWGevtGyJSbm/7cXwrGQbB 99nDwQqd1HuhJH5HNP0aCyB+91dh/dvXHYUWNclt3hHNF9J9hDRIhRaVhe0xCOvtiqi3 mv9xza8ZeSRDxK6qbkL8QMFXHJiI3OBVPRgITMYFrFBcNfH0yhkQOjwY4WrZ0cArfCFW 8yHi1VPbzy/9gO6v4CMtd2F5JWl+es4h5CclsLVt+iFGX+OWquU322x6LO1PPTEFybda 4AFNLkhZMUeSSqOlnrW1GFXBXwt1/IXSwKiw1MDxMwX7APlhv1GiXXPR32XrCGkG+/Su n2bQ== X-Received: by 10.58.75.34 with SMTP id z2mr353780vev.57.1386802223005; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:50:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rx6sm25048389vec.6.2013.12.11.14.50.20 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:50:21 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:50:19 -0600 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:50:19 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC Message-ID: <20131211225019.GB30501@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20131211204110.GA30092@linux1> <52A8CF7D.3090309@gentoo.org> <20131211205613.GA16261@leliel.pault.ag> <52A8D47C.2080807@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52A8D47C.2080807@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 0dd99f93-e99c-4f7d-977c-922f8715bb6d X-Archives-Hash: 9455e1befd61f7d87eaa003018f15839 --TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 09:09:16PM +0000, Markos Chandras wrote: > If that's the case then I see no reason to go through the migration path > for users :) The symlink thing can be done immediately. > I am wondering, wouldn't Debian be able to rename "rc" to "openrc" in > their openrc package just before merging it to the read filesystem (I > assume Debian also builds and installs in sandbox first?)? In this case > we will not have to touch openrc (or the ebuild) at all. No, because of the symlinks that we point to it. Remember that rc is a multi-call binary. for example, all of the symlinks in /lib*/rc/bin will have to be adjusted. William --TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlKo7CsACgkQblQW9DDEZTiGggCeNSRSC4YbhTHMWMmGP1DI2HZ5 nDwAoJYzgB3IZdbrI9QWR3GwBeSjK42i =W05i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu--