From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93A413827E for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D21B2E0CA0; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-f173.google.com (mail-ve0-f173.google.com [209.85.128.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86A8DE0B2F for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f173.google.com with SMTP id oz11so6361557veb.4 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:04:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=11EIsggV6dwYvXI7fQEcKCvzjKlvwyDee9CZBZnIoxA=; b=goKPAbu4dxQliwMZW5MuFrFb42Rtna5mIyf0yJoDSSKwG/DcqWJFo3GNAxuMi7qqIA d5xHc87REdTkwkxJekwgqrgGayyF+D0aiW2mKv3BP05sSF45ONsCVUSUqaAc8GX5PIEK +i82fMyEbWN/QcvQfcD0/rIdkBLq4vEU/6QrnAI/Fe6AZshU8BOOTSDgPCQcYiVGSYps oUz/ccwh36xuJqJQk8FPi+dOSr1qM/NkB1apQy4D5ZtspHAg5mnyoj99JNEjPtLtOeK5 Lm/+g+7TRBdOTECm0JvfN+pMakKgAzsDBsBncLElRrD+Aeqk3pb5d/PoYdSB2aUMk8SE RTzQ== X-Received: by 10.58.246.136 with SMTP id xw8mr1382095vec.41.1386795873866; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:04:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id je2sm28283957vdb.13.2013.12.11.13.04.31 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:04:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:30 -0600 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:30 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC Message-ID: <20131211210430.GA30316@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20131211204110.GA30092@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 00106c45-23e0-465e-8bb7-e73d82a9815a X-Archives-Hash: f244d870b8e0302df41daa1858db2934 --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:41 PM, William Hubbs wro= te: > > > > All, > > > > We got a request from Debian to rename the "rc" binary of OpenRC due to > > a naming conflict they have. They have a port of the at&t plan 9 shell, > > which has a binary named "rc" as well[1]. > > > > My thought is to rename our "rc" to "openrc", since that would be >=20 > are you going to rename also rc-service and rc-update? No, there isn't a need for that, just "rc". William --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlKo014ACgkQblQW9DDEZTh7PQCgkQZ6k8wSlj8znJ50R1eZmauK MCwAnigkDDqdulsoGP6NJasTNvvZWJ4U =9HNC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--