From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BA213827E for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BC5DE0BC5; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f47.google.com (mail-vb0-f47.google.com [209.85.212.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A612E0B5A for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id q12so2012379vbe.20 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:41:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=X5lORQEovbBPSh1UvM+ic8JaH403ZOqENdGos2IEGHM=; b=fLwYnaZOeqAl1F7OMMI3Jc+9kro14tjgyX79Mz2AtNcptF43znB89vBzQpF7peClBI gmLM6gNKRTpqDbmVyxTzRwWymvZ9N9Ql/7F8f1t5g5qxwLeSpqT0iXncoxwtWzuzO33w mjs8o6ayfFod0YZ0V8TBa4LIRozkgFEt4IYMiwWegOLPnxg5NRX1U/05gkdkV23poG+u xbiXyC2/YjeW7y+Llhps3ZkDfAJcyblNx9pxQI2f5SZOjgb5Sa+eee0XR6oJ1/NWsBd9 8ZPqnZmNASvMcZF6jKWeP15OUBH7RA+HByypE+NdLMiNjg7t6tCZbwfFxZEB2S520tNj zD6A== X-Received: by 10.220.250.4 with SMTP id mm4mr866646vcb.47.1386794474194; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b13sm22443160vdj.6.2013.12.11.12.41.11 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:41:12 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:41:10 -0600 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:41:10 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo development Subject: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC Message-ID: <20131211204110.GA30092@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo development Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 7aefac83-01ad-433e-8dd4-1bbf471388dc X-Archives-Hash: aa67b8360f6031822116b071084de538 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline All, We got a request from Debian to rename the "rc" binary of OpenRC due to a naming conflict they have. They have a port of the at&t plan 9 shell, which has a binary named "rc" as well[1]. My thought is to rename our "rc" to "openrc", since that would be unique. I know at least one thing that will break is everyone's inittab, so should I sed their inittab in our live ebuild or expect them to fix it and give a warning? I know that once OpenRC with this change is released, it will need to probably be p.masked until there is a new release of sysvinit that updates the inittab. I'm not sure what else will break. Does anyone have any ideas wrt other things to look for, or should I make the changes upstream and have people let us know what else breaks? William [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlKozeYACgkQblQW9DDEZTiv/QCeIw3izIFglie3YdbgGs7e/Ceb jQgAoJHvsQEPErZsAMivcxHi8WYMlIYK =MTjb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--