From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CF913827E for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 20:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EDAFE0A43; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 20:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from georges.telenet-ops.be (georges.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.68]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA8DE09EB for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 20:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by georges.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id z8Vd1m00t2khLEN068VeNL; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:29:38 +0100 Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:28:03 +0100 From: Tom Wijsman To: ulm@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Message-ID: <20131208212803.60a34fe8@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <21156.54496.55818.685610@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20131208175612.2b8c7e38@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <201312081819.40449.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <21156.50471.613516.395616@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20131208210436.47b7e6d5@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <21156.54496.55818.685610@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/2JjT=QRrH3EPF6BBFONY00F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d8996854-688f-4df3-96cf-3572eb720a84 X-Archives-Hash: 899e84462351caced2dc8bb4e8f41f41 --Sig_/2JjT=QRrH3EPF6BBFONY00F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:21:52 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Nothing undefined here. A dependency without a slot means that all > slot values are acceptable. Is that stated in the PMS? > And all package managers interpret it in the same way. Because it is the previous behavior (adopted from versions?); it is undefined behavior from the PMS point of view if it is not stated. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/2JjT=QRrH3EPF6BBFONY00F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSpNZTAAoJEJWyH81tNOV9gMsH/A1L1F7zlDbdLPLQBhY8YRA2 Dk2ryyeKQ8we9v9N01w0TpiEQd/79BBcR3pTSSD1r8j+uiVQZgMTqMDOMGJd8p7z IUdV6sSYSeUTpIWGnY/HaaPTV839cCxGhV4k2CTJaBEJ3qva3PzYPgbL/LP2tscv /8ttUO11xEdU8XMYYeqZ3gGzdeH2P2maNuFUC8HJmFDnFqifNmt/qaUqhmnhZRxt wDYzgcIMbay8uKRj/5cr0S5bAzWPja8oStHQPy+H+6ZTxV2z/mPoPZ8dJSWlnUhY pOVt1ya5h7zO64glADiI96vUV+Azu6XkbEDO/AiBVJudXVqHFyOt7qyCgDijEZA= =BFK1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2JjT=QRrH3EPF6BBFONY00F--