From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-63782-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B1713827E
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun,  8 Dec 2013 20:25:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E05EE09F1;
	Sun,  8 Dec 2013 20:25:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 703F7E09DE
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  8 Dec 2013 20:25:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hi5so2923087wib.2
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 12:25:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type;
        bh=t5ahfLD88PjGisPBYqD9l40KgoxvEE0Z7FhR3ZHGAcU=;
        b=GZuGjUHjFRLYjWdRHGICs4+FDhC6Qdvb8SPe4CdNPzTEw+OHJ1TDFG39anVhEFS+R7
         ke0A7DHPi9yFhG8VcJGT6Q6C0hnmFY/8ihOfMqAgVpEDP5Q/OSQBsQ5x4BEDgPqef/sb
         /OrAdLQDRq22JRp1uw/bMe62sIKjAHV/oV9eVLigzPOUa+xU7NTXDnTLQulnkH2GEdpj
         m14tBgTDuI26P6R0bEGEuI7XLrPA9Lz0eqsEhs60RDNoQstpludnsI2q6JLEdUaPqaib
         gvJBvOkarUIzSC4CvJUk6/yvOAFpHfFwNuMLFkM8ieI6v1kq7nh5q5j1uLpKoIhJKke5
         y7XA==
X-Received: by 10.195.13.45 with SMTP id ev13mr12302409wjd.20.1386534346279;
        Sun, 08 Dec 2013 12:25:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (cpc3-broo7-2-0-cust157.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.30.224.158])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id uc18sm18147601wib.11.2013.12.08.12.25.45
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sun, 08 Dec 2013 12:25:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 20:25:40 +0000
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value
 acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead?
Message-ID: <20131208202540.28d3a8f5@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131208212159.0a49761f@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
References: <20131208175612.2b8c7e38@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
	<201312081819.40449.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
	<21156.50471.613516.395616@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	<CAGfcS_=Y5hwaVw60cX==XxYPu0Z6wK5TOJYQrkc9Att83fqiHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<21156.53244.886349.924357@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	<20131208212159.0a49761f@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_//=OUt.Pvk4c++Vx6p/+DrPW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 0899dc60-3955-477b-a4cf-83e38d3c1368
X-Archives-Hash: 30c2188951cc1ecf041a5cfa3e683ad6

--Sig_//=OUt.Pvk4c++Vx6p/+DrPW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:21:59 +0100
Tom Wijsman <TomWij@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:01:00 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > >>>>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >=20
> > > Sure it does - it defaults to :* when :* was never specified. I
> > > don't see how defaulting to :0=3D is a "policy" any more than :* is.
> >=20
> > Defaulting to :* is just the long term behaviour from EAPIs 0 to 4
> > when no slot operator was specified.
>=20
> Which section in the PMS is this specified?

It's not, exactly. Paludis treats :* and "no slot specified"
differently. The former allows for runtime switching of slots. The
latter assumes "we don't know which slot it needs, so to be safe we'll
have to assume it could be any of them".

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh

--Sig_//=OUt.Pvk4c++Vx6p/+DrPW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlKk1cgACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFU6gCfZY1uLZx/UxFf1Q8xyejHcw5V
CHMAn1pz+98aGIP7FHd2dcZ9GeiRDLvi
=y7Iv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_//=OUt.Pvk4c++Vx6p/+DrPW--