From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCA613827E for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 19:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3091E0983; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 19:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DD9BE0804 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 19:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id a1so2610470wgh.29 for ; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 11:49:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=RScm49jJVVk8twiCdNKhWSPokkqhN4eMeCvdqWY5x7Q=; b=GxiSGgi9+5EXr/hF1XcOzLS2fCNMevKFTRD99ShBPfTT2UmrA866qBZIKyz8gc+mkF ta+KpmuRnezStNAjpMiIAUwb3BAzrnUnjR8Ec4irY/vi+796KlD1ivtu1eNqcz553UDu smoZpc7wW5kQzC4LCZbQbCvDaITDy0f2WWCCO2GELvcaVwke7ecEDzxm7JQAvqM1X8hv QakdI12bk9IFJzLZ0W8y1E1OQebmtpt1uH45ViZmWvK8HRa9ZI4oOrkYMAf1Pad/ukcm GSC4S5wGu26mPYoZNEMIEge6O0tn5V4GHBi2kS9eh8BMQP9fBmDDd3+AyPZGA+FKvVZ0 JOiA== X-Received: by 10.180.73.6 with SMTP id h6mr4466667wiv.20.1386532147168; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 11:49:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cpc3-broo7-2-0-cust157.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.30.224.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w1sm17904068wib.6.2013.12.08.11.49.06 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Dec 2013 11:49:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 19:48:57 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Message-ID: <20131208194857.054e91e3@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20131208175612.2b8c7e38@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <201312081819.40449.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <21156.50471.613516.395616@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/wR3hx6O3JzfI6HmxqF3TpBX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 27c2b430-cbbb-44e5-9975-39f25762051a X-Archives-Hash: 65c58dac55f24063c3cba8ea2a9dfa4c --Sig_/wR3hx6O3JzfI6HmxqF3TpBX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:39:39 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > PMS just provides a mechanism, but doesn't prefer one SLOT value > > over another. Such a change would introduce policy into PMS which > > is not the right way to go. >=20 > Sure it does - it defaults to :* when :* was never specified. I don't > see how defaulting to :0=3D is a "policy" any more than :* is. SLOT=3D0 isn't special in PMS these days. (Historically it was. Now SLOT is mandatory, and it doesn't default to 0.) --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/wR3hx6O3JzfI6HmxqF3TpBX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlKkzTEACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHrYgCghv6OnP66MQgBsctuAgM4tXdm ZAUAoMjhDVF3iSFMhei+WgNd4G5BrZLK =b2ma -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wR3hx6O3JzfI6HmxqF3TpBX--