From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B3A138247 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DA3DE0B50; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB637E0B40 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shanghai.paradoxon.rec (p4FDA8E50.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.218.142.80]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: polynomial-c) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED36933D762; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:24:35 +0100 From: Lars Wendler To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: dcmwai@gmail.com, samba@gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos] Message-ID: <20131206162435.7cc53c6c@shanghai.paradoxon.rec> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/oCJIU6dCUMDvxNBFVViDfuu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 62f019fa-ccd5-40f6-a5cf-9b2c92044cbc X-Archives-Hash: 587032cf1a0594ac3109a8372f9e8d20 --Sig_/oCJIU6dCUMDvxNBFVViDfuu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi list, in [1] we got a bug where was pointed out that it is impossible to use =3Dnet-fs/samba-4* on a system which has dev-libs/openssl[kerberos] installed. Long story short, samba-4 hard requires app-crypt/heimdal while openssl[kerberos] hard requires app-crypt/mit-krb5. Of course both packages are mutually exclusive as both are their own kerberos implementation. The bug reporter suggests to use bundled heimdal from samba-4 which I would like to avoid if possible. If anyone knows some better solution please speak up. It is highly appreciated. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/490872 Kind regards --=20 Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer --Sig_/oCJIU6dCUMDvxNBFVViDfuu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJSoew3AAoJEPiazRVxLXTFNDcQAM+ktJCQkPHYKa8Emmq2syPL 4OwV2eFD7rDSwv2aoD3wUrISGvQbEHT/LUSy5Se9D1gb62RojjN/7DxWFqM/H0LR W1lG3b0W4xDB8LYEot/6TxnjL13xasUvDCzMWFIeWjlMjdv4uXVAClmEFTE9ZL8B rcOLCJuorCxwqpO/l9104fki9pYDZTxfZut0kIAJX7IQYe4allLXSiR8wCLR9KpB vsCdGMinfvXxNRSdSU0D2RBjxn8lEZHDt8sWir4tOcHshUB9WcZ32h10zwq6q4f5 07A4COMuBXV5sWxSuxmI7Uil/XdMVMMYXXqRSyMCk8mgf7tuATiZbaIn+hk/KBJl rIyWe18jRxWGdTKvn7n612dZigM/GGZ04qvBjN9lFvm8AlHlbW9dYqsfOHO+gBpU MY28DRNiyd2dta+Ip4Xo74ratkuUCxUU2G+K+rj1mHg4Hs8gyUTnxGKODbFAgldh U00dTEdpcXuIXy+Qe7jYxuMzpMHVgnvSFTUsoTIBBmmE0zDBH1b97zia+kWoT+TF g9awvqCfIj1O4orGQ9z3IDK/VCAyorWa5osd5tmhH56oYTgeWpUxvajKIHcNDltU 9vHvyK/rVieO84sAt3yQwSHVrZgFA6oR3JYtR8S1dkw+80RtgZmqEK+D9ULDxyk8 NiIBdsdh8xRDfzs7N1Km =rpV/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/oCJIU6dCUMDvxNBFVViDfuu--