From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2DA138247 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 00:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6162DE0E3C; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 00:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f54.google.com (mail-qa0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D47E0B8A for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 00:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id f11so7206410qae.20 for ; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:13:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=grLqW1H+ZfVO8NEmAs2OX90oxZtvj97R95bC6jNV590=; b=YihG4JE7tFV816AL9nOMYcqXbTFKlb/Ewbjk9uWwOFz57OzK0LrLoOrYs2ffOoagyd 6budYRHXmWqpXh1jKCslIgmq5jkwnBnvaM/J+j2xmO6B0fDld2o11t+DvygYrkDAdCTc F4Sj1svzDgp/Zk85eExQvTmVDjLMpgN4qYx013e6aWppC/Fsfz14R3L9WMFmi5zskLZj RG8M+5vePxWijmzGW4CMNcMDs3pr4otrPU60Sl86GYuABGuCKIJk4KaDKH7eAeRWpTI3 OnwkGMkcH5T/RBZ7BKk8ymOcn6Kr4qbHA1d4oYGvOnRpu29BmAU/pU356jY2qs4i2M84 5xWw== X-Received: by 10.49.26.129 with SMTP id l1mr40312905qeg.37.1386202393472; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:13:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o10sm24322542qaa.6.2013.12.04.16.13.11 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:13:12 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:13:09 -0600 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:13:09 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Message-ID: <20131205001309.GA19961@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20131201102015.GA1219@egeo> <20131202202845.GA8574@linux1> <529CF973.2020008@gentoo.org> <529CFAA1.7080608@gentoo.org> <20131203211130.GA31972@linux1> <529F5C6C.7060704@gentoo.org> <20131204212537.GA19609@linux1> <529FBE92.4000003@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <529FBE92.4000003@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: b5979d20-1892-4036-b2b3-95034d355c0d X-Archives-Hash: 1032c46cc4f9e1fca50a717106a21ac6 --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 07:45:22AM +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 12/05/2013 05:30 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:25 PM, William Hubbs wro= te: > >> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:46:36PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: > >>> seems like a virtual that wouldn't do anything useful except pull in > >>> random package(s) a la binary-distribution style > >> > >> What about the stages? Don't we need some form of net support in > >> stage 3? > >> > >=20 > > That's debatable. For a typical install, the user has to install other > > basic stuff like a boot loader, kernel, etc. So having them also > > select a network config framework seems logical. > >=20 > > Is there a use case for a stage3 in which installing netifrc by hand > > is impractical? > >=20 > Well ... >=20 > I remember filing a bug quite a while ago because we didn't have a dhcp > client included anymore. This made installs quite annoying because > before it was stage3, kernel, bootloader, go! >=20 > And now it was go ... stop ... reboot ... install dhcp client ... > grremblwrrxrmkrxtlmrrrg .... reboot Are you sure this was caused by an issue in the stages? The description you are giving sounds like an issue with the LiveCD. William --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlKfxRUACgkQblQW9DDEZThCuwCfXB7ZEocjeY657W0lGCfRVdy9 sLYAn06jb0kctAPNemJqja4dgKv9VBt2 =cumt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo--