From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D42138247 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:43:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3F2DE0DF2; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qe0-f52.google.com (mail-qe0-f52.google.com [209.85.128.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDD32E0DC8 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ne12so16525666qeb.25 for ; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:42:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=BDkM32lkb/SkUkkOmIQJmSa6D62jrFXI0pTpQKrWCgw=; b=CKaediv1w+DD3EgHKGP3o0fOIRYJQPz0S4xArOqsmyPRLeidJRQN1Lv2jk6EP/N+Z1 GBomgW5XnK7317e/sEo+UT29m+llNrt3dtgKvuehoD78NXaCW9qt600J3jCPyxK6cZpU hZpAUeisVJXwezCQlenJjO03iiYM23Kv6OxWHMkRINbvJB8YeYFjUL1xlal5ejLzHtQm r4RpWrikaDTYo0IA1tUF9Nwn5HE5TxM7viIOF++HCIntPECmW9uIMuA1CwzE/zjjAERS eVJs6Ob0+SPH6b+yyexeGRPh6MCViTUOcmyy3rcSTxnrnkJopkZ0DCRzcDo7yJvcmyIP uP8g== X-Received: by 10.229.13.133 with SMTP id c5mr39339409qca.22.1386200577978; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:42:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 4sm153161899qak.11.2013.12.04.15.42.55 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:42:57 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:42:54 -0600 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:42:54 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Message-ID: <20131204234254.GA19864@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20131202202845.GA8574@linux1> <529CF973.2020008@gentoo.org> <529CFAA1.7080608@gentoo.org> <20131203211130.GA31972@linux1> <529F5C6C.7060704@gentoo.org> <20131204212537.GA19609@linux1> <20131204223152.GA19756@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: cf983cfa-9803-4882-a522-a4741e5a0669 X-Archives-Hash: 2ef129c72f2227498b0d5bbac7101cd8 --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:36:37PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Thinking on this further, the same logic could be applied to > sys-apps/openrc, and probably a few other packages that are not > build/toolchain critical. I suppose we need to draw a sanity line > somewhere. ^_^ I think what you are talking about is going through @system and cleaning out unnecessary virtuals, or other packages. This is an interesting topic, but should be a separate thread imo. William --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlKfvf4ACgkQblQW9DDEZTgbxACgqph6jNS9xxboE0Tmh0Fi6FjW KLAAnR+UVvrMgOhk7tTTdhzZgXoseJxM =rgWM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE--