From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AAF138247 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17D5BE0E50; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-f44.google.com (mail-yh0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334C6E0E47 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f64so11986292yha.3 for ; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:31:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=zV2g/Q1IKePKNRqzyOeRqB2rGhh8QAYLL4Fj6y+JPQc=; b=AA89CC5KqiinE/LcD1rSuoAEuBVmA1EyNxM/Tum1y/E4JI6SKYvKb2EgGLJZWgpADn 99FiJyeZNTK+VlbV1Octv98uXkdCC398AoLp7prbWtfdGzVfp+w8YlplBljMvHrimufe SBuR3ofUt5rQZkdkE83qVM+gj0jRrtQf3J9fSBELjo2bDKPNlbDuorPJlY5GIni5uVaJ JM1ITnJERd5lliyxVl3Pk2Qb2jTFLcDWaTrE0HwZPMp0Flth4E5x4UEYRGP7r9xCYLoi okT9zQdMrC5lnogcnJwdnc9RVWSFtQ0KlkpDvQI68Krz6KBGXQy9mpPiYYDINBb3xf+X 1kIQ== X-Received: by 10.236.20.75 with SMTP id o51mr8551605yho.65.1386196316264; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:31:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v45sm144155626yha.2.2013.12.04.14.31.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:31:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:31:52 -0600 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:31:52 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Message-ID: <20131204223152.GA19756@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20131201102015.GA1219@egeo> <20131202202845.GA8574@linux1> <529CF973.2020008@gentoo.org> <529CFAA1.7080608@gentoo.org> <20131203211130.GA31972@linux1> <529F5C6C.7060704@gentoo.org> <20131204212537.GA19609@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 3236743b-e7a2-4e60-bb22-1a0e7d34c9a3 X-Archives-Hash: 40b55ebc40a8b89803a9081e6cd09401 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 04:30:30PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:25 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:46:36PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> seems like a virtual that wouldn't do anything useful except pull in > >> random package(s) a la binary-distribution style > > > > What about the stages? Don't we need some form of net support in > > stage 3? > > >=20 > That's debatable. For a typical install, the user has to install other > basic stuff like a boot loader, kernel, etc. So having them also > select a network config framework seems logical. >=20 > Is there a use case for a stage3 in which installing netifrc by hand > is impractical? Personally, I don't know of one. Does anyone else? William --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlKfrVgACgkQblQW9DDEZTgL6wCfamn6GoW2+GlI08TSFdNZB+5u UAwAn14enzQue8Mv+iTexA/whPwFJ9vl =ITo+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--