From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3389D138247 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEA79E0E32; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-f41.google.com (mail-yh0-f41.google.com [209.85.213.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10E4CE0B6D for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f41.google.com with SMTP id f11so12019670yha.28 for ; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:25:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=7qNgjnO25Sdl57uMIznNcFtH41RIBbbCH++SJpaAeKQ=; b=W8KRqd88/isLx1bsVxS6+HpVnBksayNO4ZTVZ8QY+9FpUVq0YlheMYA1qwHR1fn9Gu bO6gkvnYfZGv3L6DZ+Orah0UltfU1f0Jt2NNegqCKQYDMByvP/K/Z6UB92RngwblFEK8 UD5LzR3Cg9UFY4Wv2ybMseVQNIB0nJ7qM6XVfH/1p9E52ZHSFt75q5EQXExixcR1BekV eXBb95KRgQ3yK7Ie0QIKcXz3PW3KZI4qieNvCYzBsfMOmznNauzlBMtwnBs8McO7PdwL 4apnA7FExJCaStKbhQYpooauaoJrn3oZDENSknElM2yG19V1yIvhRb5+eGs97BWa/VJG ogJA== X-Received: by 10.236.2.166 with SMTP id 26mr8392039yhf.79.1386192341036; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:25:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h66sm86257431yhb.7.2013.12.04.13.25.38 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:25:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:25:37 -0600 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:25:37 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Message-ID: <20131204212537.GA19609@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20131201102015.GA1219@egeo> <20131202202845.GA8574@linux1> <529CF973.2020008@gentoo.org> <529CFAA1.7080608@gentoo.org> <20131203211130.GA31972@linux1> <529F5C6C.7060704@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <529F5C6C.7060704@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 69f6dc67-ab13-4515-b85c-0552c5edf5e3 X-Archives-Hash: 8791d47be5e39facc709f135a79d21ba --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:46:36PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: > seems like a virtual that wouldn't do anything useful except pull in > random package(s) a la binary-distribution style What about the stages? Don't we need some form of net support in stage 3? William --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlKfndEACgkQblQW9DDEZTgGZwCdEHRTWNu3ycp+oax3sd/kuzgf 9kUAnRoaaoKye0Ti1SUq2KCDRampB+Ng =iO9y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--