From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01FC138247 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 20:28:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5C06E0A43; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 20:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f50.google.com (mail-oa0-f50.google.com [209.85.219.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16647E080A for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 20:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n16so14014793oag.9 for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:28:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=Q+JiONgiKYN8DN5Wufjx8/fhhjwbQzUPCZaeDPRCjs4=; b=krfY2Mt7OxdX0bg2MH2wmJHYUTNRdNi5SFW1O5hiit3ofVL5DEnqRdiwjL9vCzdaB1 if214e03WNjLe3mJdGeEsB7SVz3ApEojrXGqSGsoKzMpUf2yg3wIfq+JMwoujBENAXPH nO9s9BPcmftxdH12Nq2yRlOwdt7VzYboh00HbdceYrLyUKueWeGctZdVpKbjmHyBhZKT +IVoiySQrQzClKfE8PzWlrzutvw1BPmz9N5GrVoFsetU2BSsYh6bQxpKcv8HhrQsG+AS 2h/r63kBp439i+/Jisce6r4UgwUP4urdaWDxlpL2yFi7FHeP8PKIQuiqzHj3uRgX2+i0 CPKw== X-Received: by 10.60.142.8 with SMTP id rs8mr56800673oeb.34.1386016128162; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:28:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dh4sm1852371obb.3.2013.12.02.12.28.46 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:28:47 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 02 Dec 2013 14:28:45 -0600 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:28:45 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Message-ID: <20131202202845.GA8574@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20131201102015.GA1219@egeo> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131201102015.GA1219@egeo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: efa13743-6d4d-4bb0-81a5-ec924bdc2b3f X-Archives-Hash: 5a958623c97343e6320290aa030bf6e2 --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:20:15AM +0100, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote: *snip* > The other two cases need a clarification: > 3) -netifrc -newnet: no network stack?!? That's correct, you do not need one if you are using something like networkmanager or dhcpcd in master mode. > 4) netifrc newnet: ??? Both would be installed, but you still have to configure the one you want to use. Also, the other message in this thread is correct; the netifrc use flag is temporary. I originally planned to release openrc-0.12.x along with a newsitem that instructed you to emerge the netifrc package if you want the legacy network stack, but some users/devs felt that Ishould go further to make sure netifrc remains installed on their systems. William --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlKc7X0ACgkQblQW9DDEZTh0mgCeL++5IRzHC6xLz1laL+Qs35KT bfcAoJw+krjQ1yNAMb2Yv0swpjlNEAn6 =eoF9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--