From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CEB138247 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 16:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AEFAE0A83; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 16:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2760CE09B0 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 16:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id y10so5413093wgg.9 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 08:52:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=P4zuidP6mxOChoPIyFsaHGBFapL5vlo1Pd8DQynsXTM=; b=GgTBx9XLGohCqOJcwkxT2tFpaMx6NVbD1bRttywQGHwzS/ETjQkwQMSFbO5CCYSqMm ktn8+CQu12PLRGwuAcSn8yE+hF3rb3TYkPBAEKzuDN+49kY4/WB6ijRPYy29wAfZliWA e9sdJNNdP5I4MgyCpU6VhPU+gjxaFT/Nm0+AoGhoykKOD9+F5zMoM9tsD5HRoghQMw+Z FtoYbyAe/i4WS85iQ6lWQtrEPgeJWg+xprh3M8bzRwc4mnARSu6VH7jr8r6WIOG6cOI2 SDUq8u6JUn6H7K0mSVq8uRAR2T66g3JWdZGsJu+iI43ujpll8ObRQNg2b83L0nqahBXN GrBA== X-Received: by 10.180.12.12 with SMTP id u12mr13673228wib.48.1384707139821; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 08:52:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cpc3-broo7-2-0-cust157.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.30.224.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id je17sm15673082wic.4.2013.11.17.08.52.19 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 17 Nov 2013 08:52:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 16:52:14 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please consider removing use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.mask Message-ID: <20131117165214.1ca48a77@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <52874F93.8030501@gentoo.org> References: <20131113151012.04145837@gentoo.org> <5283948F.1000409@gentoo.org> <52841023.9010208@gentoo.org> <20131114061328.09136f6f@gentoo.org> <20131115233934.7142bb04@gentoo.org> <1384590157.1308.13.camel@belkin5> <52874F93.8030501@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/VR7zPuHaK/nNvO+6x1keX8w"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 36060a42-16bc-4ef0-819f-73f14c4ba3da X-Archives-Hash: ac441102f40bf68f3aabbdb172fe74e3 --Sig_/VR7zPuHaK/nNvO+6x1keX8w Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:57:23 +0100 Thomas Sachau wrote: > >>> 2: multilib-portage > >=20 > > I think this has been discussed multiple times, if I don't > > misremember, PMS team is not willing to accept it until the > > specification is done... and we are waiting for that for years > > probably because it includes a lot of changes (well, Tommy will > > know much more about this) >=20 > Ever tried to write a formal spec in a foreing language? You weren't asked to write a formal spec. You were asked to provide enough information so that someone else could do that. > Creating multilib-portage was easier then this request.... Had you kept track of what changes you made and why you made them when writing multilib-portage, we'd not have this problem. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/VR7zPuHaK/nNvO+6x1keX8w Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlKI9EEACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFQWwCdF6sLRhJtolVmz7UM/5PoSbex /kkAoKu4+PFMOcodN8Iz2mS8oXrGKkQ+ =rd2m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/VR7zPuHaK/nNvO+6x1keX8w--