From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449BC138247 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3166AE09BE; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gerard.telenet-ops.be (gerard.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.48]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B775E09B0 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:21:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by gerard.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id mGLj1m00m2khLEN0HGLj3C; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:20:44 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:20:00 +0100 From: Tom Wijsman To: mgorny@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for review: python-exec package move Message-ID: <20131106172000.46ba75bb@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <20131106161247.3221c243@gentoo.org> References: <20131106161247.3221c243@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/JZ382eafcPBoMDitc2UpFUa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 6743a6ec-5fd7-45ea-9b0e-bb27dbe1b234 X-Archives-Hash: e941cfce3371b948bb1cea26001f3289 --Sig_/JZ382eafcPBoMDitc2UpFUa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:12:47 +0100 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Please note that if you applied any kind of package-specific ^ have applied > If you applied keywords to dev-python/python-exec in order to unmask ^ have applied > Python 3.3 on a stable system, please consider removing the keywords ^ these Other than that it looks perfect; it also seems to take into account the users having problems in the forums [1], for which the original instructions you gave did not appear to work. +1 for the details! :) [1]: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-974412.html --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/JZ382eafcPBoMDitc2UpFUa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSemwwAAoJEJWyH81tNOV9qQsIALNycMJEzE3p9RAE0zyzsIk+ sPtXpyP45xb3fNTgJ0JPfIVEnuVqvS9O+98ziiPt2V2uTWTpytIpaWPv2yKkU/90 VFmmlMt54VjJ89Uq3dATWLR64/b79KtgP+x9pDSNfAmB+unMr2+vQTaV7d5N7jc+ eTcqlfHFGLOl6gQYqSoAxpBAyQWmt8Vz+sTwRNzVGNjKRJPSXk0l6zxsymDENvSK X2cpjIv+zKteSyabebMxGRGLmHnikhvXX+fG/zmaSiAIMk/izTAB1P+Sk4Z90HQf XjJFsGG3mnxFGIPPEcq03cE3F/LBJrZrElAYeoasmaTpqjvsJMFYdRkIVDgMBwo= =sxX6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/JZ382eafcPBoMDitc2UpFUa--