* [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.8 unmasking
@ 2013-08-13 1:41 Ryan Hill
2013-08-13 5:13 ` Luca Barbato
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Hill @ 2013-08-13 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 435 bytes --]
I don't see any reason to keep this masked other than bug #416069, which
needs to be fixed anyways. How does Friday sound?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/416069 xorg-2.eclass: add --disable-selective-werror to configure
https://bugs.gentoo.org/461954 GCC 4.8 porting
--
Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.8 unmasking
2013-08-13 1:41 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.8 unmasking Ryan Hill
@ 2013-08-13 5:13 ` Luca Barbato
2013-08-13 23:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luca Barbato @ 2013-08-13 5:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 13/08/13 03:41, Ryan Hill wrote:
> I don't see any reason to keep this masked other than bug #416069, which
> needs to be fixed anyways. How does Friday sound?
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/416069 xorg-2.eclass: add --disable-selective-werror to configure
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/461954 GCC 4.8 porting
gcc-4.8 can miscompile libc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=56888
We should make sure we do not get bitten by this.
lu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.8 unmasking
2013-08-13 5:13 ` Luca Barbato
@ 2013-08-13 23:40 ` Ryan Hill
2013-08-14 15:56 ` Luca Barbato
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Hill @ 2013-08-13 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 862 bytes --]
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:13:13 +0200
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 13/08/13 03:41, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > I don't see any reason to keep this masked other than bug #416069, which
> > needs to be fixed anyways. How does Friday sound?
> >
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/416069 xorg-2.eclass: add
> > --disable-selective-werror to configure https://bugs.gentoo.org/461954 GCC
> > 4.8 porting
>
> gcc-4.8 can miscompile libc
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=56888
>
> We should make sure we do not get bitten by this.
We don't build glibc with -O3. Other libc's should either not use -O3 or
use -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns where applicable.
--
Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.8 unmasking
2013-08-13 23:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
@ 2013-08-14 15:56 ` Luca Barbato
2013-08-17 5:03 ` Ryan Hill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luca Barbato @ 2013-08-14 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 14/08/13 01:40, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:13:13 +0200
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> On 13/08/13 03:41, Ryan Hill wrote:
>>> I don't see any reason to keep this masked other than bug #416069, which
>>> needs to be fixed anyways. How does Friday sound?
>>>
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/416069 xorg-2.eclass: add
>>> --disable-selective-werror to configure https://bugs.gentoo.org/461954 GCC
>>> 4.8 porting
>>
>> gcc-4.8 can miscompile libc
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=56888
>>
>> We should make sure we do not get bitten by this.
>
> We don't build glibc with -O3. Other libc's should either not use -O3 or
> use -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns where applicable.
>
On certain arches the memcpy tranformation happens even on lower
optimization levels or so I saw reported.
lu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.8 unmasking
2013-08-14 15:56 ` Luca Barbato
@ 2013-08-17 5:03 ` Ryan Hill
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Hill @ 2013-08-17 5:03 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 605 bytes --]
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:56:42 +0200
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > We don't build glibc with -O3. Other libc's should either not use -O3 or
> > use -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns where applicable.
>
> On certain arches the memcpy tranformation happens even on lower
> optimization levels or so I saw reported.
I don't see how that could happen without -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns. Can
you dig up a link?
--
Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-08-17 4:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-08-13 1:41 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.8 unmasking Ryan Hill
2013-08-13 5:13 ` Luca Barbato
2013-08-13 23:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2013-08-14 15:56 ` Luca Barbato
2013-08-17 5:03 ` Ryan Hill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox