From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E0C1381F3 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 11:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8355AE0BF2; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 11:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jacques.telenet-ops.be (jacques.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.50]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699B5E0AC4 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 11:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by jacques.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id ABXv1m00M2khLEN0JBXvtx; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 13:31:55 +0200 Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 13:28:14 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8 Message-ID: <20130808132814.26cb0445@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: References: <5202416C.5@gentoo.org> <1375881254.7753.41.camel@rook> <5202DD20.8050906@gentoo.org> <520364E2.7030406@gentoo.org> <20130808114313.15aaa390@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/NJglx7B9UxvFw=EKvoCT_dq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 0af204f1-ac6a-4a74-affe-93b2e00cf662 X-Archives-Hash: 75943bdebd05ab26251d8d8688693095 --Sig_/NJglx7B9UxvFw=EKvoCT_dq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 07:19:39 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > > On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:29:06 +0200 > > hasufell wrote: > > > >> Leave it in ~arch forever, because it is incompatible with system > >> packages. (virtual/service-manager) > > > > But compatible with virtual/service-manager[-prefix,kernel_linux]. > > > > Jokes aside; I'm not aware of any requirement to be compatible with > > this particular package, so I think a blocker would suffice for > > this matter. >=20 > A blocker for what? No idea what incompatibility is being talked about, I wonder about that as well; a dependency as you suggest, can act as a blocker as well, it doesn't literally have to be blocking syntax but just a dependency that would properly act in the same way. Otherwise said, an indirect blocker. We are on the same line here. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/NJglx7B9UxvFw=EKvoCT_dq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSA4DOAAoJEJWyH81tNOV92iAH/3iVI8RI3P8Wo0c34yqPHcJ6 vsx4C/yMQjtDJPbEd+tRpx3L4nk7ZUwjK0ibEgC2tooRzvXnVsCNV437+KPJMmXj T4PhlsOPZFPFV5oe84K+QI2tlGgiukJQUuNgx33ir6O2Bk9at7eXg+FAyMD6XYuN 4325hlLHs2tG58J1cOdkWoMBFp9lB27xK0lPL31GwkVNvxIQ+AB8dRH2zdv1zp/E aTCQmlX/4mBvuNkrfONyGsJSqOKiy9i4KyKOJHQimvR0bg6POFY3Jmq7U9L3HuAr foeLBzL/CgICCJOFDmYuBKv0QI7gmEdc1m05z/dnM275NU4tjH560gajhYVinZk= =6CrN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/NJglx7B9UxvFw=EKvoCT_dq--