From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173051381F3 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16EB9E08DC; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BB7E0899 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (213-238-102-188.adsl.inetia.pl [213.238.102.188]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BB3933E4D4; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 20:55:12 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: zmedico@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook Message-ID: <20130721205512.0d003e45@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <51EC21CE.1080907@gentoo.org> References: <20337.28987.736877.961717@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120327154239.GA17394@gentoo.org> <1332870540.18466.9.camel@belkin4> <20120327180158.GA1468@siphos.be> <1332873243.11827.15.camel@rook> <20120327200532.GA15040@thinkpad.rutgers.edu> <1333094778.1407.9.camel@belkin4> <20120331084402.GA23183@gentoo.org> <1333200867.29219.2.camel@belkin4> <4F77421A.9030306@gentoo.org> <20120331232508.GA18617@waltdnes.org> <4F77A269.1070203@gentoo.org> <1374406937.23081.58.camel@localhost> <20130721135735.1cda757d@gentoo.org> <51EC21CE.1080907@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/skC6sF8cUMyJZmmM_OMs6fm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 28c6e478-aec0-44c2-b75b-6ddf0ad18543 X-Archives-Hash: 2572a388b457d346e594a78cc05a7fd5 --Sig_/skC6sF8cUMyJZmmM_OMs6fm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2013-07-21, o godz. 11:00:46 Zac Medico napisa=C5=82(a): > On 07/21/2013 04:57 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > a) unionfs-fuse doesn't support replacing files from read-only branch, >=20 > Maybe you've got some kind of configuration problem (did you forget to > enable the cow option?), because unionfs-fuse seems to work fine for me. It is possible. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/skC6sF8cUMyJZmmM_OMs6fm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJR7C6UXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEK+RQP/1yzItK+OD6jAU1hVSNctwgi ZYCehhuokuei8cYmwbfa3jH4SkW1OFXCZ5PkvTTMO9jwKV78u54CHyTi7Z/Xtx5C aNRI5H+HiM11wbg3A49tPTrKtrpPILEOFQiMmmCJ5TGtSO+WibtM9LUDSOQKH13m 0Xs1yYkFn94jdM1n54L6T2d9PSlF262bcY5bpY4+e5rrKLCuCVu/tWvIn1KNN//k E2MZpT2o1yPqXnPJZDYpgjlIApZ44BiScFgAIomrsO2s0pE8//kJ7NzKP9gVFcLC pkvjPo2d7bAOlJZTME4pIFBNR2uROpzHhmVy6NqRbKDmCzuBnKyCkgvfL07VjDAv owj+safTnCsrCbIwZh7W8Qq34Tp4/pP7jw3AIQZvXCEM3MPal1X6ZT7XMe1zdwRz xY4acXfrIgaGyw/Wqnu0f7CE7cpVyu9vW7+vXFiewf4voSO9IShAJaZOPpOClT2e KXYCDjn/hZClssCM081X6pVCsehHcrcExfonGk9bWUiIJmFDGfKFe1tiJLmJslnt jYeXSNSxbanWX1BnFgniMzNnQblWrrluAUThwMNRi577w7S99aiiA4+MIkVTwa1K o7vlhZiIMqElRF+q8vsObGkzM4QsD7F0SbbyTEYkC3KbE1u2LrkcsMYTVw46EyRy hdYmQ4hYyR3nMLQuPvNk =osb9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/skC6sF8cUMyJZmmM_OMs6fm--