From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB21A1381F3 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C11C6E0AC2; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from georges.telenet-ops.be (georges.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.68]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF67E0AB6 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by georges.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id v6wJ1l01b2khLEN066wJpZ; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:56:21 +0200 Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 20:56:15 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration. Message-ID: <20130701205615.18fdcea2@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: References: <20130701164149.131490f8@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130701181749.GA3831@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Np34E7J_S_CZF1MUdgEz6xP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 74f6b7f9-bd9e-47cd-8f66-b396752602a1 X-Archives-Hash: 1547e733885d8e5f3e120de46a8a0832 --Sig_/Np34E7J_S_CZF1MUdgEz6xP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 19:38:48 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote: > I certainly don't feel safe anymore running non-upstream code in > production boxes. You don't run it unless you explicitly tick on that you want experimental functionality _as well as_ the optional features in question; as I said earlier on chat, I don't understand your point here. If you don't enable them, genpatches is just like it is before; I'm not sure why the recommendations should change here, especially with vanilla-sources taking a further step away from Gentoo Security and QA. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/Np34E7J_S_CZF1MUdgEz6xP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR0dDPAAoJEJWyH81tNOV9hxgH/R7xrR0AZHZ68GkJZT4UCfd5 3Y8K1a6m5ge6jQebTTarKPGIdTa9TJzYIyVy97IFegeZCgL2+u57eNW6psJVBSS4 wLrfZ1b9smTKFJgSH7Tb8MantvNV9pdUHdxOO1jl0V/97oGx3BXxgw63EVRjJPLZ eRGAigedTMGmHsRuVAsNP+6k7XSU0o3POQreuzazX2Ctw6gxMnW8YkiKrDjsiSlH RQLO6P1I9VgcwvaZ0E+48qRhHGrSEpGW2BQ5iK+vqv+9AuPIkv8wn5KsTl1LMLrd nQbeUZxQqm3ljGGR3i9TZ/Afd9XE7KD7AGnTah6QvQYmAI+HNRexya4WrkwzQ5I= =fmW+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Np34E7J_S_CZF1MUdgEz6xP--