On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:08:45 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Am Freitag, 21. Juni 2013, 14:50:29 schrieb Markos Chandras:

> > That is true. There is nothing special about there m-w bugs. They are
> > still unresolved bugs, for many years. No need to treat
> > them differently.

> How can a m-w bug be resolved? Adding the package is unlikely to happen if 
> last request came years ago.
> 
> My suggestion would be (this is how I handled it in printing):
> 
> 1) leave message on bug 
> "Is anyone still interested in this?"
> 
> 2) if noone replies in 2 months, resolve as obsolete

Of course that would knock them off the list. :)

Maybe we could have two lists for each year - one with and one without m-w bugs.


-- 
Ryan Hill                        psn: dirtyepic_sk
   gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org

47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E  7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463