From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7161381F3 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A83CE0932; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB188E08A1 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:12:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (pc-145-111-101-190.cm.vtr.net [190.101.111.145]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aballier) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FC2C33E709 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:11:55 -0400 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman default Message-ID: <20130625161155.035a75ea@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <51C9E271.5010806@gentoo.org> References: <20130625104710.7158f5a1@gentoo.org> <51C9E271.5010806@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.1 (GTK+ 2.24.19; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 41c63f0d-6f7e-4ea4-a139-1d6fe912381b X-Archives-Hash: 020a622d77b409628e6a3a424d808faa On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:33:21 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > On 06/25/2013 07:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400 > > Michael Sterrett wrote: > > > >> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss. > > > > > > wont this disable important regular checks also? > > The -I (--ignore-masked) option only disables dependency checks for > masked "parent" packages. > > > foo is masked by package.mask, bar depends on foo. repoman -I wont > > catch a broken dep in bar. > > No, we don't currently have an option like that, and I don't think we > want one like that. > > > IMHO it should do the -I check in addition to the current ones and > > print warnings/errors. > > The -I option only disables checks that are normally enabled. ooops yes, thanks. I got confused and thought it was --without-mask... Alexis.