From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0FA1381F3 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44EDBE0B0B; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gerard.telenet-ops.be (gerard.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.48]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084BEE0AE7 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by gerard.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id rNNE1l00h2khLEN0HNNE9q; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:22:14 +0200 Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:19:24 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: robbat2@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Soliciting input for a non-maintainer update (NMU) GLEP Message-ID: <20130622121924.093dfc7b@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: References: <201306212017.38571.vapier@gentoo.org> <201306212106.31519.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/jeJavhuLrmNyRm/c0.7KaLQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 860695d8-5b59-421e-86de-ec46facbaec2 X-Archives-Hash: cb6ee8ee0f6ccda6ea91e213dab1ebc0 --Sig_/jeJavhuLrmNyRm/c0.7KaLQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:42:13 +0000 "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > So we have: > Who =3D {ANYTHING_GOES, REQUIRES_DEV, REQUIRES_HERD, > REQUIRES_MAINTAINER} What =3D {NONE, TRIVIAL, MINOR_FEATURES, > VERSION_BUMP, MAJOR_FEATURES} Why is there a NONE in What? Shouldn't it be NONE by default or do we want NONE to mean that we explicitly don't want it? That is, how does NONE differ from when the policy is missing? =20 > So most of my packages might be coded with: > > >=20 > - If you're a developer, you can do trivial fixes, add minor features, > bump the version. > - If you're in the herd, you can add major features. Is there always a strict order in the What entries? For instance, what if someone wants people to do version bumps but not do minor features? How would you specify that in this syntax? Thank you in advance for clarifying. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/jeJavhuLrmNyRm/c0.7KaLQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRxXoyAAoJEJWyH81tNOV9RqcH/0akyoqx4ew9pIqCR0U6UWQZ rkzClVVRir+N2m1TtWGlJaEqFWnu3UZfWwNk/cX49kZGr5k/LcP5lCFFkgb66E78 Ebu5yUH6aC0JQoP6WACtvRN3omzMj409mbTCQ0mTNQZY1Nfm5svuUm5TSj2yLULG aTwXcPr2FJInx549dt5GtBcNd9Z88WS9IaeIoSHrGWBZhGlz0M2PilzgSFmFFjfT x/tSKOP7rWo4GURSFurt72u2FMAciOjNGw8McfifoEJ5b5H+O76q/g7ydwgoHbEn 6FfXdd2PjMK4EFApl3N932bwiceHSNtRsdTLzNUDidOCIOMIx+ZN+3eMlTfKqmM= =odMn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/jeJavhuLrmNyRm/c0.7KaLQ--