From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8011381F3 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A81D5E0B3C; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:11:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C31DBE0B04 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (213-238-104-114.adsl.inetia.pl [213.238.104.114]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EC9333E49D; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:12:35 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: dilfridge@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year Message-ID: <20130621211235.576bf5f8@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201306212108.45890.dilfridge@gentoo.org> References: <2721009.MOcim2sagC@arcarius> <201306212108.45890.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.1 (GTK+ 2.24.19; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/EpYf2IVnxxI1PLpAJ4P3Pi4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: e8e61c28-5fb7-4180-8a9d-cb00395bdfca X-Archives-Hash: 31a9b8ac9de2d031abb09b59521fe0a8 --Sig_/EpYf2IVnxxI1PLpAJ4P3Pi4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2013-06-21, o godz. 21:08:45 "Andreas K. Huettel" napisa=C5=82(a): > Am Freitag, 21. Juni 2013, 14:50:29 schrieb Markos Chandras: > > That is true. There is nothing special about there m-w bugs. They are > > still unresolved bugs, for many years. No need to treat > > them differently. >=20 > How can a m-w bug be resolved? Adding the package is unlikely to happen i= f=20 > last request came years ago. >=20 > My suggestion would be (this is how I handled it in printing): >=20 > 1) leave message on bug=20 > "Is anyone still interested in this?" Er, unless you're going to do something about the bug, please don't do that. Otherwise, it's like pinging someone and then telling 'ok, nevermind.' --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/EpYf2IVnxxI1PLpAJ4P3Pi4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRxKWjXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEKgZkP/3iRj122OMT1A4rD8d3N7PaW bn2aV+y+TuYPB4iHg3Jlwb4a0AFFH0AL1C3Ty9eunEgb3UtP5Uf4F3QrmV5dZSrm zWhpyu2609iPnXz8LBsKYqgftYu3lZlq2Zp8S2AhcgMCBtFPPPyHjtjxLWrl1ZDk c787ih7nI1JyjyeEoLUyiS4Thyqd/2JSCW3O+QiwXN4ah7i+PdhsUppzD1ovl/CZ JqdzIeWAb8NYEqjXT1+lOrwHjinc2G19+wWDcnolHhQH5CzaiC77b8YsCZcuPB5b fUgmtdF9VUf6jo5whjnbkn7DjnevLAERnNSusAL1szJ8CYWAMg8DhRQQr5BnGaDi QA5FP5D7BAAVUGJTClQ16hST5IEXYSfMzQFnFUNxJM/0azS2EU+JnhL08uptJTuQ cqh1whkS1ocf7YJmTLRFTtqO78mmX+1FaTMoEEzjvMdTpGg1Evgj3GNEyeVNaxLs QoQJ1iU6gcRhbDS3C00qPjPeFc8HayJZda6nfrb3h6wVPEGCc9J+ormtxDJgAMRD KPzwVf1xuYuZt0WhIBRhdFBKTDTgJe5UHDM5ABEU1J8A0aNNgAu3hpdfrCvZiFIR rq5h+m4TNc6JXAr8lUoqzPfjA18XANn0Om35wYMJXZPFyO/j7n5tln3mvxKl7xC4 fXxqmYD/AslVySmcHwHh =KjhY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/EpYf2IVnxxI1PLpAJ4P3Pi4--