From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EDA1381F3 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C166AE0AA2; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D24D6E0A9E for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9343433E670 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:06:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Soliciting input for a non-maintainer update (NMU) GLEP Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:06:30 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201306212017.38571.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2135478.itTGMolcHm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201306212106.31519.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: dc0d2ed4-17e1-482f-844e-3dafd4b3b996 X-Archives-Hash: 11199628416b4129f242bbb685cb9bb7 --nextPart2135478.itTGMolcHm Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 21 June 2013 20:26:03 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:17:38PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > I'm not going into review systems here at all, I'm simply trying to > > > have a policy of what changes are welcomed/blocked WITHOUT interaction > > > from the listed maintainer(s) of a given package/herd. > >=20 > > add a new field to metadata.xml that declares the state. make it an en= um: > > ANYTHING_GOES (the default) > > REQUIRES_HERD > > REQUIRES_MAINTAINER >=20 > I wish it was that easy. >=20 > Despite being ANYTHING_GOES on most of my packages, I don't want people > to add giant features like qmail patchbombs; so we need to figure out > something like the Debian NMU listing of what's acceptable. the maintainers intent has to be machine codable > Does this need to be coded in the metadata? yes. we already have maintainer info in there, and putting it anywhere els= e=20 is doomed to failure. > Does a version bump count as an acceptable trivial change? that's up to the maintainer =2Dmike --nextPart2135478.itTGMolcHm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRxPiXAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBVyEP/j2HAbKHOHoanxY5/mxMdgv4 4OqseleMd/cX1OhsVJ1CdJFkIujbnrtRO77tgszy06csxAR6g5L7JBsxoxxf9NZl 5rkeORmfwxPy3zbltfTWvzbHboMSQiLoEzd2cx5VJS4UUPxbVb7JVZ/FsgRg/PvS XEYxX4JRvmjq1GQ/IY83Z6UGB1uY4QjTqbjIRlRZ4LGveComcb6EI2V9yDnt8g5a v/mpSThGbyYMLXd2mW8EK652EsmiK1+GfWSVLVZcmziGmgGVYkQTJzHpypcsUVeh OPYAbJANkVPNy6WOanLbV2vRHhDTfg5Qi72tEKgkSxHug88JCQ/IyU7eD2BrF907 tmnKCtaBIMD3pik69LjJKYkW8A9IS63TpqvGj1UQVC4loli13AqbqYHkp5981uXv 20BdYyP+krsR4FwXJ8quFa6i83hWL0cXnnyNqUtA6aDa6THyPo5E+XLe1rekQ6mT v2mf6X+APpgs7uhoO5SC8asijMCEFZglOycNf/R4nBaGBckUcwWr/jbbtETyzkw8 feATVQkyBKYLHxFVHiOnqD/FnZ3fikV17q8SzbMs4mq6dg/4OP8+mtMD+z/3YW8p j3mn6spaMb75zhYRFexT/r/THzUga3q28BEa+9GX8GKzwF3FXauFPIYcunPhsUmD knHK/zifY8Vl4jMKZB/U =wNz6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2135478.itTGMolcHm--