On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 01:50:02PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 06/21/2013 01:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Thanks for the explanation. But I think that, currently, the only
> > remaining "objection" is whether play with /sbin/init (that needs
> > sysvinit to be changed if I don't misremember) or with /sbin/einit.
> > Looks like mgorny has shown some problems on relying on "einit" instead
> > of plain "init" regarding to fallback :/
> 
> I prefer having /sbin/init used for the pivot since /sbin/einit is a bit
> more brittle and as Fabio did the whole machinery is _still_ opt-in.

No, he has his own versions of the systemd and sysvinit ebuilds which
move some of the installation to non-standard places as part of this
machinery, so it is not opt-in.

Also, there was an email on this thread showing that using
init=/sbin/einit works, so I'm not seeing what mgorny's objections are.

William