From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82BB1381F3 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 02:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10FE7E081B; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 02:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110DFE08C2 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 02:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (213-238-104-114.adsl.inetia.pl [213.238.104.114]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CCA133E482; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 02:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 04:39:59 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: williamh@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init Message-ID: <20130621043959.7eae0921@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20130620205609.GB23719@linux1> References: <51A08A68.3020900@gentoo.org> <20130620205609.GB23719@linux1> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.1 (GTK+ 2.24.19; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/9GAiL/7tOI6uUCmeFipA0mz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 8c4df47c-cc88-45dc-b1fe-f2cf18f25ed4 X-Archives-Hash: 1c195f999f710d1dee841cba0ec35a4a --Sig_/9GAiL/7tOI6uUCmeFipA0mz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2013-06-20, o godz. 15:56:09 William Hubbs napisa=C5=82(a): > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:16:36PM +0200, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > > There is a new version of eselect-init in the systemd-love overlay to p= lay with. > > The new version saw the following major changes: > >=20 > > - the /sbin/init (aka the symlink that eselect-init handles) can be > > changed to whatever one wants through make.conf [1] (this is a compile > > time option, as documented in the eclass) >=20 > Why do we need to mess with /sbin/init at all? Yes, we do because we don't want sysvinit randomly getting run as fallback and messing with our systems. > I like the suggestion that came up here on the list a while back, have > the eselect init module install its own symlink at, say, /sbin/einit. > You would still have to have the user edit their boot loader > configuration file one time if they want to use this, but this makes it > completely opt-in. Plus hacking kernel sources to disable /sbin/init fallback. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/9GAiL/7tOI6uUCmeFipA0mz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQJ7BAEBCgBmBQJRw70CXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEKh/oP91bqckAlgEZLafvwAE+89X2G OoAHpeERlnwy7C6GMkf5WtxFUC0nJmZqZS3CUwpj++ZMYR4ETpfLsrTI+CUhc3hw gsA6kEgOIqSoEZX959HyPnhdvuBP0bXrZu+wlHTIuGWXyJKY5ikIEeV591dObks0 InQ/S9Z78QKEXY6Kya+Xnfu37dEN9+nSH1ZfWyXttkjtn52Gztnu11stVZd/JwFB aY2QJDXFgKhmMFI2EaiRdFEfAq6K2uisLzkfVYazAuyiSgfdzQPGy6JHoLWALJSF merVD38FzVJFraIOQtkSQvOkcvah+zroK14txO04gafMJ6BShOtKSjeJqiLfFXe6 AXqKVKUfchx9KSWfx0WLlZ2k49US3VkXABPBrfTHgSFnhTB1AngbGTnMHgRyuIMg rano7J1PpbSINr/JHlMC4+si/ty205tzFzlVToS+dz8/9uZBXhM45THIBoV0Kfs+ gc+tS7pzyQ/PXnxWUicLxNKHi9RWWedZC2QTrU/qZdvSuTNC7AMNpsIEAZotCgT8 EIbFdOMYmpoODybXioFivFUg3KWuGwR18hFn0510WlHbqKpjsJCniOOAVcdn0Jlc LKiPJ9485RUrABPKzlWjooZ1dNRQcgzQSjqEcrub0FK6z07Lf+oPMefqigpS3ICL +2JmXLkACT5Y5sX/WSE= =mulb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/9GAiL/7tOI6uUCmeFipA0mz--